TY - JOUR
T1 - Venous thromboembolic risk stratification in pediatric trauma
T2 - A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee multicenter analysis
AU - Labuz, Daniel F.
AU - Cunningham, Aaron
AU - Tobias, Joseph
AU - Dixon, Alexandra
AU - Dewey, Elizabeth
AU - Marenco, Christopher W.
AU - Escobar, Mauricio A.
AU - Hazeltine, Max D.
AU - Cleary, Muriel A.
AU - Kotagal, Meera
AU - Falcone, Richard A.
AU - Fallon, Sara C.
AU - Naik-Mathuria, Bindi
AU - Macarthur, Taleen
AU - Klinkner, Denise B.
AU - Shah, Aashka
AU - Chernoguz, Artur
AU - Orioles, Alberto
AU - Zagel, Alicia
AU - Gosain, Ankush
AU - Knaus, Maria
AU - Hamilton, Nicholas A.
AU - Jafri, Mubeen A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children is rare, but its consequences are significant. Several risk stratification algorithms for VTE in pediatric trauma exist with little consensus, and all are hindered in development by relying on registry data with known inaccuracies. We performed a multicenter review to evaluate trauma registry fidelity and confirm the effectiveness of one established algorithm across diverse centers. METHODS Local trauma registries at 10 institutions were queried for all patients younger than 18 years admitted between 2009 and 2018. Additional chart review was performed on all "VTE"cases and random non-VTE controls to assess registry errors. Corrected data were then applied to our prediction algorithm using 10 real-time variables (Glasgow Coma Scale, age, sex, intensive care unit admission, transfusion, central line placement, lower extremity/pelvic fracture, major surgery) to calculate VTE risk scores. Contingency table classifiers and the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve were calculated. RESULTS Registries identified 52,524 pediatric trauma patients with 99 episodes of VTE; however, chart review found that 13 cases were misclassified for a corrected total of 86 cases (0.16%). After correction, the algorithm still displayed strong performance in discriminating VTE-fated encounters (sensitivity, 69%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.96). Furthermore, despite wide institutional variability in VTE rates (0.04-1.7%), the algorithm maintained a specificity of >91% and a negative predictive value of >99.7% across centers. Chart review also revealed that 54% (n = 45) of VTEs were directly associated with a central line, usually femoral (n = 34, p < 0.001 compared with upper extremity), and that prophylaxis rates were underreported in the registries by about 50%; still, only 19% of the VTE cases had been on prophylaxis before diagnosis. CONCLUSION The VTE prediction algorithm performed well when applied retrospectively across 10 diverse pediatric centers using corrected registry data. These findings can advance initiatives for VTE screening/prophylaxis guidance following pediatric trauma and warrant prospective study.
AB - BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in injured children is rare, but its consequences are significant. Several risk stratification algorithms for VTE in pediatric trauma exist with little consensus, and all are hindered in development by relying on registry data with known inaccuracies. We performed a multicenter review to evaluate trauma registry fidelity and confirm the effectiveness of one established algorithm across diverse centers. METHODS Local trauma registries at 10 institutions were queried for all patients younger than 18 years admitted between 2009 and 2018. Additional chart review was performed on all "VTE"cases and random non-VTE controls to assess registry errors. Corrected data were then applied to our prediction algorithm using 10 real-time variables (Glasgow Coma Scale, age, sex, intensive care unit admission, transfusion, central line placement, lower extremity/pelvic fracture, major surgery) to calculate VTE risk scores. Contingency table classifiers and the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve were calculated. RESULTS Registries identified 52,524 pediatric trauma patients with 99 episodes of VTE; however, chart review found that 13 cases were misclassified for a corrected total of 86 cases (0.16%). After correction, the algorithm still displayed strong performance in discriminating VTE-fated encounters (sensitivity, 69%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.96). Furthermore, despite wide institutional variability in VTE rates (0.04-1.7%), the algorithm maintained a specificity of >91% and a negative predictive value of >99.7% across centers. Chart review also revealed that 54% (n = 45) of VTEs were directly associated with a central line, usually femoral (n = 34, p < 0.001 compared with upper extremity), and that prophylaxis rates were underreported in the registries by about 50%; still, only 19% of the VTE cases had been on prophylaxis before diagnosis. CONCLUSION The VTE prediction algorithm performed well when applied retrospectively across 10 diverse pediatric centers using corrected registry data. These findings can advance initiatives for VTE screening/prophylaxis guidance following pediatric trauma and warrant prospective study.
KW - Pediatric trauma
KW - deep vein thrombosis
KW - thromboprophylaxis
KW - venous thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116804561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116804561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003290
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003290
M3 - Article
C2 - 34039921
AN - SCOPUS:85116804561
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 91
SP - 605
EP - 611
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 4
ER -