TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing to perform VATS for traumatic-retained hemothorax (a systematic review and meta-analysis)
AU - Ziapour, Behrad
AU - Mostafidi, Elmira
AU - Sadeghi-Bazargani, Homayoun
AU - Kabir, Ali
AU - Okereke, Ikenna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Purpose: In this systematic review, we analyzed the optimal time range to evacuate traumatic-retained hemothorax using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trials database up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with relevant data were included. Data were extracted from studies that reported the success, mortality, or length of hospital stay (LOS) after using VATS during at least two out of three of our time-ranges of interest: days 1–3 (group A), days 4–6 (group B), and day 7 or later (group C). Results: Six cohort studies with 476 total participants were included in the meta-analysis. The patients in group A had a significantly higher success rate than those in group C (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21–0.84, p = 0.01). The total LOS for patients whose retained hemothorax was evacuated in group A was 4.7 days shorter than that for those in group B (95% CI = − 5.6 to − 3.8, p = 0.006). Likewise, group B patients were discharged 18.1 days earlier than group C patients (95% CI = − 22.3 to − 14, p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was not decreased by early VATS. Conclusions: Our results indicate that VATS should be considered within the first three days of admission if this intervention is the clinician's choice to evacuate a traumatic-retained hemothorax.
AB - Purpose: In this systematic review, we analyzed the optimal time range to evacuate traumatic-retained hemothorax using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trials database up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with relevant data were included. Data were extracted from studies that reported the success, mortality, or length of hospital stay (LOS) after using VATS during at least two out of three of our time-ranges of interest: days 1–3 (group A), days 4–6 (group B), and day 7 or later (group C). Results: Six cohort studies with 476 total participants were included in the meta-analysis. The patients in group A had a significantly higher success rate than those in group C (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21–0.84, p = 0.01). The total LOS for patients whose retained hemothorax was evacuated in group A was 4.7 days shorter than that for those in group B (95% CI = − 5.6 to − 3.8, p = 0.006). Likewise, group B patients were discharged 18.1 days earlier than group C patients (95% CI = − 22.3 to − 14, p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was not decreased by early VATS. Conclusions: Our results indicate that VATS should be considered within the first three days of admission if this intervention is the clinician's choice to evacuate a traumatic-retained hemothorax.
KW - Hemothorax
KW - Retained hemothorax
KW - Thoracic injuries
KW - Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076624932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076624932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-019-01275-2
DO - 10.1007/s00068-019-01275-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31848631
AN - SCOPUS:85076624932
SN - 1863-9933
VL - 46
SP - 337
EP - 346
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
IS - 2
ER -