TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care
AU - Jensen, Roxanne E.
AU - Rothrock, Nan E.
AU - Dewitt, Esi M.
AU - Spiegel, Brennan
AU - Tucker, Carole A.
AU - Crane, Heidi M.
AU - Forrest, Christopher B.
AU - Patrick, Donald L.
AU - Fredericksen, Rob
AU - Shulman, Lisa M.
AU - Cella, David
AU - Crane, Paul K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2015/2/2
Y1 - 2015/2/2
N2 - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are gaining recognition as key measures for improving the quality of patient care in clinical care settings. Three factors have made the implementation of PROs in clinical care more feasible: increased use of modern measurement methods in PRO design and validation, rapid progression of technology (eg, touchscreen tablets, Internet accessibility, and electronic health records), and greater demand for measurement and monitoring of PROs by regulators, payers, accreditors, and professional organizations. As electronic PRO collection and reporting capabilities have improved, the challenges of collecting PRO data have changed. OBJECTIVES:: To update information on PRO adoption considerations in clinical care, highlighting electronic and technical advances with respect to measure selection, clinical workflow, data infrastructure, and outcomes reporting. METHODS:: Five practical case studies across diverse health care settings and patient populations are used to explore how implementation barriers were addressed to promote the successful integration of PRO collection into the clinical workflow. The case studies address selecting and reporting of relevant content, workflow integration, previsit screening, effective evaluation, and electronic health record integration. CONCLUSIONS:: These case studies exemplify elements of well-designed electronic systems, including response automation, tailoring of item selection and reporting algorithms, flexibility of collection location, and integration with patient health care data elements. They also highlight emerging logistical barriers in this area, such as the need for specialized technological and methodological expertise, and design limitations of current electronic data capture systems.
AB - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are gaining recognition as key measures for improving the quality of patient care in clinical care settings. Three factors have made the implementation of PROs in clinical care more feasible: increased use of modern measurement methods in PRO design and validation, rapid progression of technology (eg, touchscreen tablets, Internet accessibility, and electronic health records), and greater demand for measurement and monitoring of PROs by regulators, payers, accreditors, and professional organizations. As electronic PRO collection and reporting capabilities have improved, the challenges of collecting PRO data have changed. OBJECTIVES:: To update information on PRO adoption considerations in clinical care, highlighting electronic and technical advances with respect to measure selection, clinical workflow, data infrastructure, and outcomes reporting. METHODS:: Five practical case studies across diverse health care settings and patient populations are used to explore how implementation barriers were addressed to promote the successful integration of PRO collection into the clinical workflow. The case studies address selecting and reporting of relevant content, workflow integration, previsit screening, effective evaluation, and electronic health record integration. CONCLUSIONS:: These case studies exemplify elements of well-designed electronic systems, including response automation, tailoring of item selection and reporting algorithms, flexibility of collection location, and integration with patient health care data elements. They also highlight emerging logistical barriers in this area, such as the need for specialized technological and methodological expertise, and design limitations of current electronic data capture systems.
KW - Patient-reported outcomes
KW - clinical decision-making
KW - quality of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921944900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921944900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000289
DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000289
M3 - Article
C2 - 25588135
AN - SCOPUS:84921944900
SN - 0025-7079
VL - 53
SP - 153
EP - 159
JO - Medical care
JF - Medical care
IS - 2
ER -