The paradoxical influence of thymine analogues on restriction endonuclease cleavage of oligodeoxynucleotides

Mark Mazurek, Lawrence C. Sowers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Thymine residues in the DNA of eucaryotes may be replaced occasionally by uracil (U) or 5-(hydroxymethyl)uracil (H) as consequences of dUMP misincorporation or thymine oxidation, respectively. In this study, we constructed a series of 44-base oligonucleotides containing site-specific U or H residues and 5'-fluorescein labels in order to probe the influence of such modifications on sequence-specific DNA-protein interactions using several type II restriction endonucleases. We find that substitution within the recognition sites of several restriction endonucleases increases initial cleavage velocity by up to an order of magnitude. These results contrast dramatically with several previous studies which demonstrated that U substitution in short oligonucleotides inhibits or prevents nuclease cleavage. We propose that this apparent paradox results because the rate- limiting step in the cleavage of longer oligonucleotides is product release whereas for shorter oligonucleotides substrate binding is most probably rate- limiting. For longer oligonucleotides and DNA, more rapid release of the cleaved, substituted oligonucleotides results in more rapid turnover and a faster apparent cleavage rate. The sequence length at which the transition in ratelimiting step occurs likely corresponds to the size of the enzyme footprint on its DNA recognition site. We conclude that both U and H do perturb sequence-specific DNA-protein interactions, and the magnitude of this effect is site-dependent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11522-11528
Number of pages7
Issue number35
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'The paradoxical influence of thymine analogues on restriction endonuclease cleavage of oligodeoxynucleotides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this