TY - JOUR
T1 - The evaluation of mitral valve stenosis
T2 - Comparison of transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance
AU - Helvacioglu, Funda
AU - Yildirimturk, Ozlem
AU - Duran, Cihan
AU - Yurdakul, Selen
AU - Tayyareci, Yelda
AU - Ulusoy, Onur Levent
AU - Aytekin, Saide
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Aims Echocardiographic assessment of patients with mitral valve stenosis (MS) requires a detailed evaluation of mitral valve anatomy, mitral valve area (MVA), and pressure gradient and presence concomitant valve diseases. Our aim was to evaluate planimetric MVA and transmitral flow velocities using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with isolated MS and to compare with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to determine the reliability. Methods and results Thirty-one patients (mean age 50.4 ± 10.2, 90.3% women) with isolated MS who were in a normal sinus rhythm were included in the study. Patients with ejection fraction <50%, atrial fibrillation, moderate-to-severe mitral valve insufficiency, moderate-to-severe stenosis and insufficiency of other valves, and previous commissurotomy and valvulotomy were excluded. Planimetric MVA and diastolic velocities were measured with TTE and CMR.There were strong correlations between measurements of planimetric MVA and transmitral diastolic velocities (P < 0.0001). Assessment of Bland-Altman analysis revealed strong agreement on measuring planimetric MVA with values-0.018 cm 2 (SD = 0.98 cm2) and the limits of agreement were-0.131 to 0.094. Conclusion CMR is a reliable method in patients with MS for diagnosis and follow-up.
AB - Aims Echocardiographic assessment of patients with mitral valve stenosis (MS) requires a detailed evaluation of mitral valve anatomy, mitral valve area (MVA), and pressure gradient and presence concomitant valve diseases. Our aim was to evaluate planimetric MVA and transmitral flow velocities using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with isolated MS and to compare with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to determine the reliability. Methods and results Thirty-one patients (mean age 50.4 ± 10.2, 90.3% women) with isolated MS who were in a normal sinus rhythm were included in the study. Patients with ejection fraction <50%, atrial fibrillation, moderate-to-severe mitral valve insufficiency, moderate-to-severe stenosis and insufficiency of other valves, and previous commissurotomy and valvulotomy were excluded. Planimetric MVA and diastolic velocities were measured with TTE and CMR.There were strong correlations between measurements of planimetric MVA and transmitral diastolic velocities (P < 0.0001). Assessment of Bland-Altman analysis revealed strong agreement on measuring planimetric MVA with values-0.018 cm 2 (SD = 0.98 cm2) and the limits of agreement were-0.131 to 0.094. Conclusion CMR is a reliable method in patients with MS for diagnosis and follow-up.
KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Mitral valve stenosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892916821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892916821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jet087
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jet087
M3 - Article
C2 - 24026945
AN - SCOPUS:84892916821
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 15
SP - 164
EP - 169
JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 2
ER -