TY - JOUR
T1 - The Austrian Breast Implant Register
T2 - Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery
AU - Wurzer, Paul
AU - Rappl, Thomas
AU - Friedl, Herwig
AU - Kamolz, Lars Peter
AU - Spendel, Stephan
AU - Hoflehner, Helmut
AU - Parvizi, Daryousch
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
PY - 2014/12
Y1 - 2014/12
N2 - Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever.Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
AB - Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever.Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KW - Breast implant
KW - Breast surgery
KW - Quality service
KW - Register
KW - Silicone prosthesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922080282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922080282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2
DO - 10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 25320030
AN - SCOPUS:84922080282
SN - 0364-216X
VL - 38
SP - 1109
EP - 1115
JO - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
JF - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
IS - 6
ER -