TY - JOUR
T1 - Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Houschyar, Khosrow S.
AU - Tapking, Christian
AU - Borrelli, Mimi R.
AU - Puladi, Behrus
AU - Ooms, Mark
AU - Wallner, Christoph
AU - Duscher, Dominik
AU - Pförringer, Dominik
AU - Rein, Susanne
AU - Reumuth, Georg
AU - Schulz, Torsten
AU - Nietzschmann, Ina
AU - Maan, Zeshaan N.
AU - Grieb, Gerrit
AU - Philipp-Dormston, Wolfgang G.
AU - Branski, Ludwik K.
AU - Siemers, Frank
AU - Lehnhardt, Marcus
AU - Schmitt, Laurenz
AU - Yazdi, Amir S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 MA Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/2
Y1 - 2021/12/2
N2 - Objective: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe skin and mucosal reactions that are associated with high mortality. Despite the severity, an evidence-based treatment protocol for SJS/TEN is still lacking. Method: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed database was searched using the following terms: [Stevens–Johnson syndrome] OR [toxic epidermal necrolysis] AND [therapy] OR [treatment] over a 20-year period (1999–2019) in the German and English language. All clinical studies reporting on the treatment of SJS/TEN were included, and epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of treatment were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted on all comparative clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 2647 patients. Treatment was either supportive or used systemic corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclosporine, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide therapy. The meta-analysis included 16 (18%) studies, reporting outcomes in 976 (37%) patients. Systemic glucocorticoids showed a survival benefit for SJS/TEN patients in all analyses compared with other forms of treatment. Cyclosporine treatment also showed promising results, despite being used in a small cohort of patients. No beneficial effects on mortality could be demonstrated for intravenous immunoglobulins. Conclusion: Glucocorticoids and cyclosporine may be tentatively recommended as the most promising immunomodulatory therapies for SJS/TEN, but these results should be investigated in future prospective controlled trials.
AB - Objective: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe skin and mucosal reactions that are associated with high mortality. Despite the severity, an evidence-based treatment protocol for SJS/TEN is still lacking. Method: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed database was searched using the following terms: [Stevens–Johnson syndrome] OR [toxic epidermal necrolysis] AND [therapy] OR [treatment] over a 20-year period (1999–2019) in the German and English language. All clinical studies reporting on the treatment of SJS/TEN were included, and epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of treatment were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted on all comparative clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 2647 patients. Treatment was either supportive or used systemic corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclosporine, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide therapy. The meta-analysis included 16 (18%) studies, reporting outcomes in 976 (37%) patients. Systemic glucocorticoids showed a survival benefit for SJS/TEN patients in all analyses compared with other forms of treatment. Cyclosporine treatment also showed promising results, despite being used in a small cohort of patients. No beneficial effects on mortality could be demonstrated for intravenous immunoglobulins. Conclusion: Glucocorticoids and cyclosporine may be tentatively recommended as the most promising immunomodulatory therapies for SJS/TEN, but these results should be investigated in future prospective controlled trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121125620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121125620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.12.1012
DO - 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.12.1012
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34881995
AN - SCOPUS:85121125620
SN - 0969-0700
VL - 30
SP - 1012
EP - 1019
JO - Journal of Wound Care
JF - Journal of Wound Care
IS - 12
ER -