TY - JOUR
T1 - School Staff’s Perspectives on the Adoption of Elementary-School Physical Activity Approaches
T2 - A Qualitative Study
AU - Szeszulski, Jacob
AU - Walker, Timothy J.
AU - Robertson, Michael C.
AU - Cuccaro, Paula
AU - Fernandez, Maria E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 SHAPE America.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Background: There is a need to understand how schools adopt physical activity approaches (curricula, programs and practices), but few studies report on this process. Purpose: To obtain elementary school staff’s perspectives regarding how their schools are currently adopting physical activity approaches. Methods: We recruited 15 participants from four job types in an urban Texas school district to participate in semi-structured interviews. We coded and analyzed interviews using directed content analysis and iterative categorization. Results: We identified four themes pertaining to how the district, schools, and teachers contribute to the adoption of approaches. Themes included: (1) Staff identify new approaches through numerous channels; (2) Adoption occurs at multiple organizational levels; (3) District staff fulfilled a supporting role in the adoption process; and (4) School staff’s perceptions of approach characteristics influence adoption. Discussion: We found that schools adopt physical activity approaches at both the district- and school-level. Additionally, multiple stakeholders played a role in the adoption process and those roles varied across approaches. Translation to Health Education Practice: Time, money, space, staff, competing priorities, limited information, the school’s mission, and the benefits an approach provides to children are factors that researchers and practitioners should consider when starting a new physical activity approach.
AB - Background: There is a need to understand how schools adopt physical activity approaches (curricula, programs and practices), but few studies report on this process. Purpose: To obtain elementary school staff’s perspectives regarding how their schools are currently adopting physical activity approaches. Methods: We recruited 15 participants from four job types in an urban Texas school district to participate in semi-structured interviews. We coded and analyzed interviews using directed content analysis and iterative categorization. Results: We identified four themes pertaining to how the district, schools, and teachers contribute to the adoption of approaches. Themes included: (1) Staff identify new approaches through numerous channels; (2) Adoption occurs at multiple organizational levels; (3) District staff fulfilled a supporting role in the adoption process; and (4) School staff’s perceptions of approach characteristics influence adoption. Discussion: We found that schools adopt physical activity approaches at both the district- and school-level. Additionally, multiple stakeholders played a role in the adoption process and those roles varied across approaches. Translation to Health Education Practice: Time, money, space, staff, competing priorities, limited information, the school’s mission, and the benefits an approach provides to children are factors that researchers and practitioners should consider when starting a new physical activity approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092890508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092890508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19325037.2020.1822241
DO - 10.1080/19325037.2020.1822241
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092890508
SN - 1932-5037
VL - 51
SP - 395
EP - 405
JO - American Journal of Health Education
JF - American Journal of Health Education
IS - 6
ER -