Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation

Glenn V. Ostir; Pamela M. Smith; D. Smith; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher

doi:10.1191/0269215505cr894oa

Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation

Glenn V. Ostir, Pamela M. Smith, D. Smith, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To examine the reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in patients 90 and 100 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design: A prospective study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 31 medical rehabilitation patients. Main measures: The PANAS. Results: The average age was 74 years, 80.7% were female and the average length of stay was 13 days. The test-retest intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the positive and negative affect scales (at the 90 and 100 day follow-up assessment) were 0.79 and 0,93, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that the PANAS has excellent reliability among a sample of patients who received inpatient medical rehabilitation.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	767-769
Number of pages	3
Journal	Clinical Rehabilitation
Volume	19
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr894oa
State	Published - Oct 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1191/0269215505cr894oa

Cite this

@article{ee2bee1b1bd5493dbc64c5ac9f4029ca,

title = "Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation",

abstract = "Objective: To examine the reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in patients 90 and 100 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design: A prospective study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 31 medical rehabilitation patients. Main measures: The PANAS. Results: The average age was 74 years, 80.7% were female and the average length of stay was 13 days. The test-retest intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the positive and negative affect scales (at the 90 and 100 day follow-up assessment) were 0.79 and 0,93, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that the PANAS has excellent reliability among a sample of patients who received inpatient medical rehabilitation.",

author = "Ostir, {Glenn V.} and Smith, {Pamela M.} and D. Smith and Ottenbacher, {Kenneth J.}",

year = "2005",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1191/0269215505cr894oa",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

pages = "767--769",

journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",

issn = "0269-2155",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation

AU - Ostir, Glenn V.

AU - Smith, Pamela M.

AU - Smith, D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Objective: To examine the reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in patients 90 and 100 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design: A prospective study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 31 medical rehabilitation patients. Main measures: The PANAS. Results: The average age was 74 years, 80.7% were female and the average length of stay was 13 days. The test-retest intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the positive and negative affect scales (at the 90 and 100 day follow-up assessment) were 0.79 and 0,93, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that the PANAS has excellent reliability among a sample of patients who received inpatient medical rehabilitation.

AB - Objective: To examine the reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in patients 90 and 100 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design: A prospective study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 31 medical rehabilitation patients. Main measures: The PANAS. Results: The average age was 74 years, 80.7% were female and the average length of stay was 13 days. The test-retest intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the positive and negative affect scales (at the 90 and 100 day follow-up assessment) were 0.79 and 0,93, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that the PANAS has excellent reliability among a sample of patients who received inpatient medical rehabilitation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144457674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144457674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0269215505cr894oa

DO - 10.1191/0269215505cr894oa

M3 - Article

C2 - 16250196

AN - SCOPUS:27144457674

SN - 0269-2155

VL - 19

SP - 767

EP - 769

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

IS - 7

ER -

Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this