TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability of combined fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsies in the diagnosis of liver lesions
T2 - An 8-year institutional experience
AU - Shen, Yuan
AU - Angelova, Evgeniya
AU - Prats, Mariana Moreno
AU - Clement, Cecilia
AU - Schnadig, Vicki
AU - Stevenson-Lerner, Heather
AU - He, Jing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA), followed by core needle biopsy (CNB) when needed, was adopted as the standard care for liver lesions in our institution. This study explores the diagnostic efficacy of combined image-guided FNA and CNB in liver lesion diagnosis. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all liver FNA cases performed in our institution between January 2010 and September 2018. A total of 550 cases from 531 patients (173 females) with a median age of 59 years (range, 13–90) were identified. All FNA cases were initially assessed with rapid on-site evaluation, and cell blocks were prepared. A total of 459 FNA specimens with concurrent CNBs were included in the study. Both FNAs and CNBs in the paired sampling were read by a cytopathologist, with expert consultation as needed. Results: The concordance rate between FNA and CNB was 85.2%. Combined FNA/CNB showed higher sensitivity in detecting malignant tumours when compared to FNA or CNB alone (98%, vs 87% and 92%, p < 0.001), especially for detecting metastatic tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and haematopoietic neoplasms (98%, 97%, and 94%, respectively; all p < 0.001). Combined FNA/CNB showed a lower false negative rate in malignant tumours than FNA or CNB alone (2%, vs 13% and 8%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference among FNA, CNB, and combined FNA/CNB in diagnosing benign liver lesions. Conclusions: Combined liver FNA/CNB has high diagnostic efficacy for malignancy and a lower false negative rate than either procedure alone, especially in metastatic tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and haematopoietic neoplasms.
AB - Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA), followed by core needle biopsy (CNB) when needed, was adopted as the standard care for liver lesions in our institution. This study explores the diagnostic efficacy of combined image-guided FNA and CNB in liver lesion diagnosis. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all liver FNA cases performed in our institution between January 2010 and September 2018. A total of 550 cases from 531 patients (173 females) with a median age of 59 years (range, 13–90) were identified. All FNA cases were initially assessed with rapid on-site evaluation, and cell blocks were prepared. A total of 459 FNA specimens with concurrent CNBs were included in the study. Both FNAs and CNBs in the paired sampling were read by a cytopathologist, with expert consultation as needed. Results: The concordance rate between FNA and CNB was 85.2%. Combined FNA/CNB showed higher sensitivity in detecting malignant tumours when compared to FNA or CNB alone (98%, vs 87% and 92%, p < 0.001), especially for detecting metastatic tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and haematopoietic neoplasms (98%, 97%, and 94%, respectively; all p < 0.001). Combined FNA/CNB showed a lower false negative rate in malignant tumours than FNA or CNB alone (2%, vs 13% and 8%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference among FNA, CNB, and combined FNA/CNB in diagnosing benign liver lesions. Conclusions: Combined liver FNA/CNB has high diagnostic efficacy for malignancy and a lower false negative rate than either procedure alone, especially in metastatic tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and haematopoietic neoplasms.
KW - core needle biopsy
KW - cytology
KW - fine needle aspiration
KW - liver
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126550678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126550678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cyt.13117
DO - 10.1111/cyt.13117
M3 - Article
C2 - 35306699
AN - SCOPUS:85126550678
SN - 0956-5507
VL - 33
SP - 472
EP - 478
JO - Cytopathology
JF - Cytopathology
IS - 4
ER -