Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity. Executive summary

Walter R. Frontera; Marcus J. Fuhrer; Alan M. Jette; Leighton Chan; Rory A. Cooper; Pamela W. Duncan; John D. Kemp; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher; P. Hunter Peckham; Elliot J. Roth; Denise G. Tate

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021

Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity. Executive summary

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were researchers; research culture, environment, and infrastructure; funding; partnerships; and metrics. Participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. Small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	148-152
Number of pages	5
Journal	Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume	87
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021
State	Published - Jan 2006

Keywords

Physical medicine
Rehabilitation
Research priorities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021

Cite this

@article{650dacd732ef40608c8e1e4369609415,

title = "Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity. Executive summary",

abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were researchers; research culture, environment, and infrastructure; funding; partnerships; and metrics. Participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. Small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",

keywords = "Physical medicine, Rehabilitation, Research priorities",

author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Ottenbacher, {Kenneth J.} and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",

year = "2006",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "87",

pages = "148--152",

journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",

issn = "0003-9993",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation medicine summit

T2 - Building research capacity. Executive summary

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were researchers; research culture, environment, and infrastructure; funding; partnerships; and metrics. Participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. Small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were researchers; research culture, environment, and infrastructure; funding; partnerships; and metrics. Participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. Small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

KW - Physical medicine

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Research priorities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30144440772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30144440772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 16401455

AN - SCOPUS:30144440772

SN - 0003-9993

VL - 87

SP - 148

EP - 152

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

IS - 1

ER -

Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity. Executive summary

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this