Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity - Executive summary

Walter R. Frontera; Marcus J. Fuhrer; Alan M. Jette; Leighton Chan; Rory A. Cooper; Pamela W. Duncan; John D. Kemp; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher; P. Hunter Peckham; Elliot J. Roth; Denise G. Täte

doi:10.1093/ptj/86.2.285

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity - Executive summary

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Täte

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	285-298
Number of pages	14
Journal	Physical therapy
Volume	86
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.2.285
State	Published - Feb 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1093/ptj/86.2.285

Cite this

@article{4690dd204f0242008eeb6febee6215ba,

title = "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity - Executive summary",

abstract = "The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",

author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Ottenbacher, {Kenneth J.} and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and T{\"a}te, {Denise G.}",

year = "2006",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1093/ptj/86.2.285",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "86",

pages = "285--298",

journal = "Physical therapy",

issn = "0031-9023",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

T2 - Building Research Capacity - Executive summary

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Täte, Denise G.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31944451754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31944451754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ptj/86.2.285

DO - 10.1093/ptj/86.2.285

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16445342

AN - SCOPUS:31944451754

SN - 0031-9023

VL - 86

SP - 285

EP - 298

JO - Physical therapy

JF - Physical therapy

IS - 2

ER -

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity - Executive summary

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this