TY - JOUR
T1 - Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response
T2 - Toward HIV Data Justice
AU - Molldrem, Stephen
AU - Smith, Anthony K.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020/10/2
Y1 - 2020/10/2
N2 - In the United States, clinical HIV data reported to surveillance systems operated by jurisdictional departments of public health are re-used for epidemiology and prevention. In 2018, all jurisdictions began using HIV genetic sequence data from clinical drug resistance tests to identify people living with HIV in “clusters” of others with genetically similar strains. This is called “molecular HIV surveillance” (MHS). In 2019, “cluster detection and response” (CDR) programs that re-use MHS data became the “fourth pillar” of the national HIV strategy. Public health re-uses of HIV data are done without consent and are a source of concern among stakeholders. This article presents three cases that illuminate bioethical challenges associated with re-uses of clinical HIV data for public health. We focus on evidence-base, risk-benefit ratio, determining directionality of HIV transmission, consent, and ethical re-use. The conclusion offers strategies for “HIV data justice.” The essay contributes to a “bioethics of the oppressed.”.
AB - In the United States, clinical HIV data reported to surveillance systems operated by jurisdictional departments of public health are re-used for epidemiology and prevention. In 2018, all jurisdictions began using HIV genetic sequence data from clinical drug resistance tests to identify people living with HIV in “clusters” of others with genetically similar strains. This is called “molecular HIV surveillance” (MHS). In 2019, “cluster detection and response” (CDR) programs that re-use MHS data became the “fourth pillar” of the national HIV strategy. Public health re-uses of HIV data are done without consent and are a source of concern among stakeholders. This article presents three cases that illuminate bioethical challenges associated with re-uses of clinical HIV data for public health. We focus on evidence-base, risk-benefit ratio, determining directionality of HIV transmission, consent, and ethical re-use. The conclusion offers strategies for “HIV data justice.” The essay contributes to a “bioethics of the oppressed.”.
KW - Public health
KW - confidentiality & privacy
KW - genetic research
KW - health policy
KW - human subjects research
KW - informed consent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091313694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091313694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2020.1806373
DO - 10.1080/15265161.2020.1806373
M3 - Article
C2 - 32945756
AN - SCOPUS:85091313694
SN - 1526-5161
VL - 20
SP - 10
EP - 23
JO - American Journal of Bioethics
JF - American Journal of Bioethics
IS - 10
ER -