TY - JOUR
T1 - Poor representation of blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans in medicine
AU - Rodríguez, José E.
AU - Campbell, Kendall M.
AU - Adelson, Wendi J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this article, the authors discuss how various systems in medicine are limiting representation of blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. Flat and decreasing percentages of Underrepresented Minorities in Medicine (URMM), especially in the black and Native American populations, is concerning for family medicine since members from URMM groups care for minority and underserved populations in greater numbers. Underrepresentation is not only noted in the medical community but also in our medical schools when it comes to numbers of URMM faculty. The changing definition of “disadvantaged” in medical school admissions has also played a part in limiting URMM representation. In addition, the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) excludes black, Latino, and Native American students in greater numbers. The authors support these arguments with evidence from the medical literature. Although unintentional, these systems effectively limit representation of blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans in medicine. Effective changes are suggested and can be implemented to ensure that URMM individuals have equal representation in careers in medicine.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this article, the authors discuss how various systems in medicine are limiting representation of blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. Flat and decreasing percentages of Underrepresented Minorities in Medicine (URMM), especially in the black and Native American populations, is concerning for family medicine since members from URMM groups care for minority and underserved populations in greater numbers. Underrepresentation is not only noted in the medical community but also in our medical schools when it comes to numbers of URMM faculty. The changing definition of “disadvantaged” in medical school admissions has also played a part in limiting URMM representation. In addition, the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) excludes black, Latino, and Native American students in greater numbers. The authors support these arguments with evidence from the medical literature. Although unintentional, these systems effectively limit representation of blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans in medicine. Effective changes are suggested and can be implemented to ensure that URMM individuals have equal representation in careers in medicine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927564730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927564730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 25853595
AN - SCOPUS:84927564730
SN - 0742-3225
VL - 47
SP - 259
EP - 263
JO - Family medicine
JF - Family medicine
IS - 4
ER -