TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of Directigen flu A+B enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent assay for detection of influenza infection during the 2004-2005 season
AU - Rahman, Mahbubur
AU - Kieke, Burney A.
AU - Vandermause, Mary F.
AU - Mitchell, Paul D.
AU - Greenlee, Robert T.
AU - Belongia, Edward A.
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - Early diagnosis of influenza infection is needed to optimize the benefit of prescribing antiviral drugs. However, the accuracy of rapid tests is highly variable. This study evaluated the performance of Directigen flu A+B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and direct fluorescent assay (DFA) during the 2004-2005 influenza season. Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through an active surveillance. Consenting patients (n = 818) were enrolled and cultured for influenza. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (EIA or DFA) according to their clinical judgment. Physicians ordered rapid tests with EIA (n = 109), DFA (n = 86), or both (n = 9) in 204 patients with acute respiratory illness who were also cultured for influenza. The EIA detected 18 of 43 influenza infections (sensitivity, 42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28-57%), whereas DFA detected 26 of 38 influenza infections (sensitivity, 68%; 95% CI, 53-81%). Compared with culture, specificity of both EIA and DFA was 96%. During the 2004-2005 influenza season, both the EIA and DFA had low sensitivity and failed to detect influenza in many patients.
AB - Early diagnosis of influenza infection is needed to optimize the benefit of prescribing antiviral drugs. However, the accuracy of rapid tests is highly variable. This study evaluated the performance of Directigen flu A+B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and direct fluorescent assay (DFA) during the 2004-2005 influenza season. Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through an active surveillance. Consenting patients (n = 818) were enrolled and cultured for influenza. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (EIA or DFA) according to their clinical judgment. Physicians ordered rapid tests with EIA (n = 109), DFA (n = 86), or both (n = 9) in 204 patients with acute respiratory illness who were also cultured for influenza. The EIA detected 18 of 43 influenza infections (sensitivity, 42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28-57%), whereas DFA detected 26 of 38 influenza infections (sensitivity, 68%; 95% CI, 53-81%). Compared with culture, specificity of both EIA and DFA was 96%. During the 2004-2005 influenza season, both the EIA and DFA had low sensitivity and failed to detect influenza in many patients.
KW - Direct fluorescent assay
KW - Directigen enzyme immunoassay
KW - Influenza virus
KW - Rapid test
KW - Sensitivity
KW - Specificity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547605598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547605598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.011
DO - 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 17509800
AN - SCOPUS:34547605598
SN - 0732-8893
VL - 58
SP - 413
EP - 418
JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
IS - 4
ER -