TY - JOUR
T1 - Original article
T2 - novelty of Canadian manufacture nasopharyngeal swabs for collection of samples being tested for SARS-CoV-2 in a pandemic setting
AU - Palomino-Padilla, Sandra
AU - Caceres-Cardenas, Guillermo
AU - Calderon, Rodrigo
AU - Ko, Alex C.T.
AU - Garnett, Lauren
AU - Doan, Kaylie
AU - Chong, Patrick
AU - Lino, Hammerly
AU - Caceres, Tatiana
AU - Veres, Teodor
AU - Dos Santos, Claudia C.
AU - Nielsen, Birgit
AU - Ugarte-Gil, Cesar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Palomino-Padilla, Caceres-Cardenas, Calderon, Ko, Garnett, Doan, Chong, Lino, Caceres, Veres, Dos Santos, Nielsen and Ugarte-Gil.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a global shortage of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, required for RT-PCR testing. Canadian manufacturers were contacted to share NP swab innovations. The primary objective was to determine whether novel NP test swabs were comparable to commercially available swabs regarding user characteristics, ability to collect a specimen, and diagnostic performance using RT-PCR testing. Methods: Participants were randomized by swab (test/control) and nostril (left/right). A calculated positive percent agreement ≥90% was considered successful. Mean Ct values of viral genes and housekeeping gene (RNase P) were considered similar if a Ct difference ≤ 2 between control and test group was obtained. There also was a qualitative assessment of swabs usability. Results: 647 participants were enrolled from Huaycan Hospital in Lima, Peru, distributed over 8 NP swabs brands. Seven brands agreed to share their results. There were no statistically significant differences between the test swabs of these 7 brands and control swabs. Conclusion: All the seven brands are comparable to the commercially available flocked swabs used for SARS-CoV-2 regarding test results agreement, ability to collect a specimen, and user characteristics.
AB - Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a global shortage of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, required for RT-PCR testing. Canadian manufacturers were contacted to share NP swab innovations. The primary objective was to determine whether novel NP test swabs were comparable to commercially available swabs regarding user characteristics, ability to collect a specimen, and diagnostic performance using RT-PCR testing. Methods: Participants were randomized by swab (test/control) and nostril (left/right). A calculated positive percent agreement ≥90% was considered successful. Mean Ct values of viral genes and housekeeping gene (RNase P) were considered similar if a Ct difference ≤ 2 between control and test group was obtained. There also was a qualitative assessment of swabs usability. Results: 647 participants were enrolled from Huaycan Hospital in Lima, Peru, distributed over 8 NP swabs brands. Seven brands agreed to share their results. There were no statistically significant differences between the test swabs of these 7 brands and control swabs. Conclusion: All the seven brands are comparable to the commercially available flocked swabs used for SARS-CoV-2 regarding test results agreement, ability to collect a specimen, and user characteristics.
KW - COVID-19
KW - RT-PCR
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - nasopharyngeal
KW - swabs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193836626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193836626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344295
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344295
M3 - Article
C2 - 38784579
AN - SCOPUS:85193836626
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
M1 - 1344295
ER -