TY - JOUR
T1 - Mortality rates are similar after hip fractures for rural and urban patients
AU - Miller, Benjamin J.
AU - Cai, Xueya
AU - Cram, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
One of the authors (PC) was supported by a K23 career development award (RR01997201) from the National Center for Research Resources at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Robert Wood Johnson Physician Faculty Scholars Program. This work is funded by R01 HL085347-01A1 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the NIH. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The funding sources had no role in the analyses or drafting of the manuscript. One of the authors (PC) has received consulting fees from The Consumers Union (publisher of Consumer Reports Magazine) and Vanguard Health Inc for work advice on quality improvement initiatives. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Background Proximal femoral fractures are common in the elderly. The best care depends on expeditious presentation, medical stabilization, and treatment of the condition. Questions/purposes We investigated the risk of increased mortality in residents of rural communities secondary to inaccessible facilities and treatment delays. Patients and Methods We used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Part A data to identify 338,092 patients with hip fractures. Each patient was categorized as residing in urban, large rural, or small rural areas. We compared the distance traveled, mortality rates, time from admission to surgery, and length of stay for patients residing in each location. Results Patients in rural areas traveled substantially farther to reach their treating facility than did urban patients: mean, 34.4 miles for small rural, 14.5 miles for large rural, and 9.3 miles for urban. The adjusted odds ratios for mortality were similar but slightly better for urban patients for in-hospital mortality (small rural odds ratio, 1.05; large rural odds ratio, 1.13). Rural patients had a favorable adjusted odds ratio for 1-year mortality when compared with urban patients (small rural odds ratio, 0.93; large rural odds ratio, 0.96). Rural patients experienced no greater delay in time to surgery or longer hospital length of stay. Conclusions Although patients living in rural areas traveled a greater distance than those living in urban centers, we found no increase in time to surgery, hospital length of stay, or mortality.
AB - Background Proximal femoral fractures are common in the elderly. The best care depends on expeditious presentation, medical stabilization, and treatment of the condition. Questions/purposes We investigated the risk of increased mortality in residents of rural communities secondary to inaccessible facilities and treatment delays. Patients and Methods We used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Part A data to identify 338,092 patients with hip fractures. Each patient was categorized as residing in urban, large rural, or small rural areas. We compared the distance traveled, mortality rates, time from admission to surgery, and length of stay for patients residing in each location. Results Patients in rural areas traveled substantially farther to reach their treating facility than did urban patients: mean, 34.4 miles for small rural, 14.5 miles for large rural, and 9.3 miles for urban. The adjusted odds ratios for mortality were similar but slightly better for urban patients for in-hospital mortality (small rural odds ratio, 1.05; large rural odds ratio, 1.13). Rural patients had a favorable adjusted odds ratio for 1-year mortality when compared with urban patients (small rural odds ratio, 0.93; large rural odds ratio, 0.96). Rural patients experienced no greater delay in time to surgery or longer hospital length of stay. Conclusions Although patients living in rural areas traveled a greater distance than those living in urban centers, we found no increase in time to surgery, hospital length of stay, or mortality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864217906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864217906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11999-011-2140-3
DO - 10.1007/s11999-011-2140-3
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22016000
AN - SCOPUS:84864217906
SN - 0009-921X
VL - 470
SP - 1763
EP - 1770
JO - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
JF - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
IS - 6
ER -