TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term results of phase ii ablation after breast lumpectomy added to extend intraoperative margins (ABLATE l) trial
AU - Klimberg, V. Suzanne
AU - Ochoa, Daniela
AU - Henry-Tillman, Ronda
AU - Hardee, Matthew
AU - Boneti, Cristiano
AU - Adkins, Laura L.
AU - McCarthy, Maureen
AU - Tummel, Evan
AU - Lee, Jeannette
AU - Malak, Sharp
AU - Makhoul, Issam
AU - Korourian, Soheila
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure Information: Dr Klimberg received a research grant from AngioDynamics, Inc. and a patent on the technique. Dr Korourian is a co-patent owner. All other authors have nothing to disclose .
Funding Information:
Dr Klimberg is supported by the Tenenbaum Breast Cancer Research Fund , Little Rock, AR, and by the Fashion Footwear Association of New York (FFANY/QVC).
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Background Excision followed by radiofrequency ablation (eRFA) is an intraoperative method that uses intracavitary hyperthermia to create an additional tumor-free zone around the lumpectomy cavity in breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that eRFA after lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer could reduce the need for re-excision for close margins as well as potentially maintain local control without the need for radiation. Study Design This prospective phase II institutional review board-approved study was conducted from March 2004 to April 2010. A standard lumpectomy was performed, then the RFA probe was deployed 1 cm circumferentially into the walls of the lumpectomy cavity and maintained at 100 C for 15 minutes. Validated Doppler sonography was used to intraoperatively determine adequacy of ablation. Results One hundred patients were accrued to the trial, with an average age of 65.02 years ± 10.0 years. The stages were Tis (n = 30); T1mic (n = 1); T1a (n = 9); T1b (n = 27); T1c (n = 22); T2 (n = 10); and T3 (n = 1). Grades were I (n = 48); II (n = 29); and III (n = 23). Seventy-eight subjects had margins >2 mm (negative), 22 patients had margins ≤ 2 mm, of which 12 were close and 3 focally positive, which, at our institution, would have required re-excision (only 1 patient in this group had re-excision). There were 6% postoperative complications, and 24 patients received radiation therapy (XRT). During the study mean follow-up period of 62 months ± 24 months (68-month median follow-up) in patients not treated with XRT, there were 2 in-site tumor recurrences treated with aromitase inhibitor, 3 biopsy entrance site recurrences treated with excision and XRT to conserve the breast, and 2 recurrences elsewhere and 1 contralateral recurrence; all 3 treated with mastectomy. Conclusions Long-term follow-up suggests that eRFA may reduce the need for re-excision for close or focally positive margins in breast cancer patients, and eRFA may be a valuable tool for treating favorable patients who desire lumpectomy and either cannot or do not want radiation. A multicenter trial has been initiated based on these results.
AB - Background Excision followed by radiofrequency ablation (eRFA) is an intraoperative method that uses intracavitary hyperthermia to create an additional tumor-free zone around the lumpectomy cavity in breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that eRFA after lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer could reduce the need for re-excision for close margins as well as potentially maintain local control without the need for radiation. Study Design This prospective phase II institutional review board-approved study was conducted from March 2004 to April 2010. A standard lumpectomy was performed, then the RFA probe was deployed 1 cm circumferentially into the walls of the lumpectomy cavity and maintained at 100 C for 15 minutes. Validated Doppler sonography was used to intraoperatively determine adequacy of ablation. Results One hundred patients were accrued to the trial, with an average age of 65.02 years ± 10.0 years. The stages were Tis (n = 30); T1mic (n = 1); T1a (n = 9); T1b (n = 27); T1c (n = 22); T2 (n = 10); and T3 (n = 1). Grades were I (n = 48); II (n = 29); and III (n = 23). Seventy-eight subjects had margins >2 mm (negative), 22 patients had margins ≤ 2 mm, of which 12 were close and 3 focally positive, which, at our institution, would have required re-excision (only 1 patient in this group had re-excision). There were 6% postoperative complications, and 24 patients received radiation therapy (XRT). During the study mean follow-up period of 62 months ± 24 months (68-month median follow-up) in patients not treated with XRT, there were 2 in-site tumor recurrences treated with aromitase inhibitor, 3 biopsy entrance site recurrences treated with excision and XRT to conserve the breast, and 2 recurrences elsewhere and 1 contralateral recurrence; all 3 treated with mastectomy. Conclusions Long-term follow-up suggests that eRFA may reduce the need for re-excision for close or focally positive margins in breast cancer patients, and eRFA may be a valuable tool for treating favorable patients who desire lumpectomy and either cannot or do not want radiation. A multicenter trial has been initiated based on these results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896461914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896461914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.032
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 24655863
AN - SCOPUS:84896461914
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 218
SP - 741
EP - 749
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 4
ER -