TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraocular lens power changes after mitomycin trabeculectomy
AU - Pakravan, Mohammad
AU - Alvani, Azam
AU - Yazdani, Shahin
AU - Esfandiari, Hamed
AU - Yaseri, Mehdi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wichtig Publishing.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate biometric changes after mitomycin C augmented trabeculectomy and their effect on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using different formulas. Methods: In this prospective, interventional case series study, 34 eyes of 31 phakic glaucoma patients who were scheduled for primary trabeculectomy were enrolled. Using a noncontact biometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland), axial length (AL), mean corneal power, and IOL power were calculated with the Hoffer Q, Holladay, and SRK/T formulas 1 day before surgery and compared to those obtained 3 and 6 months after the operation. Bland-Altman plot was used to determine agreement between preoperative and postoperative IOL power values. Results: The AL was significantly decreased at month 3 (-0.14 ± 0.13 mm) and month 6 (-0.14 ± 0.15 mm) as compared to baseline values (both p values <0.001). Mean corneal power increased significantly at month 3 (0.41 ± 0.46 D; p<0.001) and month 6 (0.27 ± 0.47 D; p = 0.008). Using different formulas, IOL power did not change significantly after the operation (all ps≥0.17). The IOL power changes using the Hoffer Q formula were -0.09 ± 0.76 (p = 0.505) and 0.14 ± 0.9 D (p = 0.442) at 3 and 6 months, respectively; corresponding values were -0.1 ± 0.75 (p = 0.427) and 0.16 ± 0.79 D (p = 0.319) for Holladay and 0.01 ± 0.64 (p = 0.895) and 0.2 ± 0.71 D (p = 0.17) employing the SRK/T formula. Conclusions: Despite significant changes in AL and corneal power after trabeculectomy, IOL power calculation remains unchanged; therefore adjustment of IOL power calculation after trabeculectomy seems unnecessary.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate biometric changes after mitomycin C augmented trabeculectomy and their effect on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using different formulas. Methods: In this prospective, interventional case series study, 34 eyes of 31 phakic glaucoma patients who were scheduled for primary trabeculectomy were enrolled. Using a noncontact biometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland), axial length (AL), mean corneal power, and IOL power were calculated with the Hoffer Q, Holladay, and SRK/T formulas 1 day before surgery and compared to those obtained 3 and 6 months after the operation. Bland-Altman plot was used to determine agreement between preoperative and postoperative IOL power values. Results: The AL was significantly decreased at month 3 (-0.14 ± 0.13 mm) and month 6 (-0.14 ± 0.15 mm) as compared to baseline values (both p values <0.001). Mean corneal power increased significantly at month 3 (0.41 ± 0.46 D; p<0.001) and month 6 (0.27 ± 0.47 D; p = 0.008). Using different formulas, IOL power did not change significantly after the operation (all ps≥0.17). The IOL power changes using the Hoffer Q formula were -0.09 ± 0.76 (p = 0.505) and 0.14 ± 0.9 D (p = 0.442) at 3 and 6 months, respectively; corresponding values were -0.1 ± 0.75 (p = 0.427) and 0.16 ± 0.79 D (p = 0.319) for Holladay and 0.01 ± 0.64 (p = 0.895) and 0.2 ± 0.71 D (p = 0.17) employing the SRK/T formula. Conclusions: Despite significant changes in AL and corneal power after trabeculectomy, IOL power calculation remains unchanged; therefore adjustment of IOL power calculation after trabeculectomy seems unnecessary.
KW - Intraocular lens power
KW - Intraocular lens power calculation formulas
KW - Trabeculectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945921878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945921878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/ejo.5000604
DO - 10.5301/ejo.5000604
M3 - Article
C2 - 25837639
AN - SCOPUS:84945921878
SN - 1120-6721
VL - 25
SP - 478
EP - 482
JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - European Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 6
M1 - A04
ER -