TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating CHWs as Part of the Team Leading Diabetes Group Visits
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study
AU - Vaughan, Elizabeth M.
AU - Johnston, Craig A.
AU - Cardenas, Victor J.
AU - Moreno, Jennette P.
AU - Foreyt, John P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of the team leading diabetes group visits. Methods: This was a randomized controlled study that integrated CHWs as part of the team leading diabetes group visits for low-income Hispanic adults (n = 50). Group visits met for 3 hours each month for a 6-month duration. Main measures included baseline and 6-month clinical outcomes (ie, A1C, lipids), concordance with 8 standard of care guidelines (ie, screens for cervical, breast, and colon cancer) from the US Preventive Task Force and American Diabetes Association, and participant acceptability. Results: Compared to control participants, the intervention group resulted in significantly better clinical outcomes or guideline concordance for the following areas: target A1C levels, retinal eye exams, diabetes foot exams, mammograms, and urine microalbumin. Significantly more individuals in the control group gained weight, whereas a greater number of participants in the intervention group lost weight. Intervention participants found the group visits highly acceptable. Conclusions: Integrating CHWs as part a comprehensive diabetes group visit program is a feasible and effective system-level intervention to improve glycemic control and achieve guideline concordance.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of the team leading diabetes group visits. Methods: This was a randomized controlled study that integrated CHWs as part of the team leading diabetes group visits for low-income Hispanic adults (n = 50). Group visits met for 3 hours each month for a 6-month duration. Main measures included baseline and 6-month clinical outcomes (ie, A1C, lipids), concordance with 8 standard of care guidelines (ie, screens for cervical, breast, and colon cancer) from the US Preventive Task Force and American Diabetes Association, and participant acceptability. Results: Compared to control participants, the intervention group resulted in significantly better clinical outcomes or guideline concordance for the following areas: target A1C levels, retinal eye exams, diabetes foot exams, mammograms, and urine microalbumin. Significantly more individuals in the control group gained weight, whereas a greater number of participants in the intervention group lost weight. Intervention participants found the group visits highly acceptable. Conclusions: Integrating CHWs as part a comprehensive diabetes group visit program is a feasible and effective system-level intervention to improve glycemic control and achieve guideline concordance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034646496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034646496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0145721717737742
DO - 10.1177/0145721717737742
M3 - Article
C2 - 29047326
AN - SCOPUS:85034646496
SN - 0145-7217
VL - 43
SP - 589
EP - 599
JO - Diabetes Educator
JF - Diabetes Educator
IS - 6
ER -