TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating age and comorbidity to assess screening mammography utilization
AU - Tan, Alai
AU - Kuo, Yong Fang
AU - Goodwin, James S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas ( RP101201 ) and NIH ( K05CA134923 ). The funding agency had no role in the study's design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation of data. Sarah Toombs Smith, PhD, science editor and assistant professor in the Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, provided editorial assistance in manuscript preparation.
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - Background: Most studies use age as a cutoff to evaluate screening mammography utilization, generally examining screening up to age 75 years (the age-cutoff method). However, many experts and guidelines encourage clinicians to consider patient health and/or life expectancy. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of estimating screening mammography utilization in older women using the age-cutoff method versus using a method based on the projected life expectancy. Methods: Two cohorts were selected from female Medicare beneficiaries aged 6790 years living in Texas in 2001 and 2006. The 2001 cohort (n=716,279) was used to generate life-expectancy estimates by age and comorbidity, which were then applied to the 2006 cohort (n=697,825). Screening mammography utilization during 20062007 was measured for the 2006 cohort. Data were collected in 20002007 and analyzed in 2011. Results: The screening rate was 52.7% in women aged 6774 years based on age alone, compared to 53.5% in women in the same age group with a life expectancy of <7 years. A large proportion (63.4%) of women aged 7590 years (n=370,583) had a life expectancy of <7 years. Those women had a screening rate of 42.7%. The screening rate was 35.7% in women aged 7590 years based on age alone, compared to 16.3% in women in the same age group with a life expectancy of <5 years. Conclusions: Estimating screening mammography utilization among older women can be improved by using projected life expectancy rather than the age-cutoff method.
AB - Background: Most studies use age as a cutoff to evaluate screening mammography utilization, generally examining screening up to age 75 years (the age-cutoff method). However, many experts and guidelines encourage clinicians to consider patient health and/or life expectancy. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of estimating screening mammography utilization in older women using the age-cutoff method versus using a method based on the projected life expectancy. Methods: Two cohorts were selected from female Medicare beneficiaries aged 6790 years living in Texas in 2001 and 2006. The 2001 cohort (n=716,279) was used to generate life-expectancy estimates by age and comorbidity, which were then applied to the 2006 cohort (n=697,825). Screening mammography utilization during 20062007 was measured for the 2006 cohort. Data were collected in 20002007 and analyzed in 2011. Results: The screening rate was 52.7% in women aged 6774 years based on age alone, compared to 53.5% in women in the same age group with a life expectancy of <7 years. A large proportion (63.4%) of women aged 7590 years (n=370,583) had a life expectancy of <7 years. Those women had a screening rate of 42.7%. The screening rate was 35.7% in women aged 7590 years based on age alone, compared to 16.3% in women in the same age group with a life expectancy of <5 years. Conclusions: Estimating screening mammography utilization among older women can be improved by using projected life expectancy rather than the age-cutoff method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857216921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857216921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 22341159
AN - SCOPUS:84857216921
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 42
SP - 229
EP - 234
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 3
ER -