TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the Virtual Format on Plastic Surgery Residency and Fellowship Interviews
T2 - A National Cross-Sectional Study
AU - Ferry, Andrew M.
AU - Asaad, Malke
AU - Elmorsi, Rami
AU - Rajesh, Aashish
AU - Williams, Elizabeth M.
AU - Wolf, Steven E.
AU - Rohrich, Rod J.
AU - Pederson, William C.
AU - Maricevich, Renata S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Background: The 2020 to 2021 residency and fellowship application cycles were profoundly affected by the introduction of virtual interviews. The authors investigated the impact the virtual format had on plastic surgery residency and fellowship interviews from the perspectives of program directors. Methods: Surveys were sent to program directors of integrated plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs to ascertain their perspectives regarding the virtual format's impact on residency and fellowship interviews. Program directors were stratified into residency and fellowship cohorts, and comparative analysis was performed. Results: Ninety-two program directors, 28 from integrated plastic surgery residency programs and 64 from fellowship programs, completed our survey (35 percent). Compared to in-person interviews, virtual interviews were reported to be more economical and time efficient by program directors of residency (100 percent and 46 percent, respectively) and fellowship programs (97 percent and 48 percent, respectively). Consequentially, 36 percent and 47 percent of residency and fellowship programs were able to interview more applicants, respectively. Program directors of residency and fellowship programs reported that virtual interviews hindered their ability to assess applicants' fit with the program (75 percent and 63 percent, respectively), personality and communication skills (75 percent and 64 percent, respectively), and commitment to the field, along with their ability to function as a trainee (57 percent and 50 percent, respectively). Overall, 71 percent of program directors of residency and 58 percent of program directors of fellowship programs preferred in-person interviews. The majority of residency (71 percent) and fellowship (56 percent) program directors intend to conduct both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Despite preferring in-person interviews, program directors intend to host both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles. It remains to be seen how virtual interviews will be used moving forward.
AB - Background: The 2020 to 2021 residency and fellowship application cycles were profoundly affected by the introduction of virtual interviews. The authors investigated the impact the virtual format had on plastic surgery residency and fellowship interviews from the perspectives of program directors. Methods: Surveys were sent to program directors of integrated plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs to ascertain their perspectives regarding the virtual format's impact on residency and fellowship interviews. Program directors were stratified into residency and fellowship cohorts, and comparative analysis was performed. Results: Ninety-two program directors, 28 from integrated plastic surgery residency programs and 64 from fellowship programs, completed our survey (35 percent). Compared to in-person interviews, virtual interviews were reported to be more economical and time efficient by program directors of residency (100 percent and 46 percent, respectively) and fellowship programs (97 percent and 48 percent, respectively). Consequentially, 36 percent and 47 percent of residency and fellowship programs were able to interview more applicants, respectively. Program directors of residency and fellowship programs reported that virtual interviews hindered their ability to assess applicants' fit with the program (75 percent and 63 percent, respectively), personality and communication skills (75 percent and 64 percent, respectively), and commitment to the field, along with their ability to function as a trainee (57 percent and 50 percent, respectively). Overall, 71 percent of program directors of residency and 58 percent of program directors of fellowship programs preferred in-person interviews. The majority of residency (71 percent) and fellowship (56 percent) program directors intend to conduct both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Despite preferring in-person interviews, program directors intend to host both in-person and virtual interviews in future application cycles. It remains to be seen how virtual interviews will be used moving forward.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137127473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137127473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009442
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009442
M3 - Article
C2 - 35819981
AN - SCOPUS:85137127473
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 150
SP - 684E-690E
JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
IS - 3
ER -