Evidence-based practice: Methods to evaluate individual patient improvement

Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Steven R. Hinderer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The expectations and demands associated with evidence-based practice in medical rehabilitation require the use of research procedures that are practice based and practitioner oriented. Traditional research methods, including randomized clinical trials, are powerful techniques for determining the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions; however, randomized clinical trials have some practical and ethical limitations when applied to many research questions important to the field of medical rehabilitation, and alternative methods are needed to fully examine the effectiveness of treatment techniques for individual patients and to document clinical accountability. This paper examines the use of single-system designs and N of 1 research strategies. The advantages and limitations of single-system methods are described, and examples relevant to the documentation of clinical outcomes in medical rehabilitation are presented.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)786-796
    Number of pages11
    JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Volume80
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • Clinical Evaluation
    • Research
    • Single Subject

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based practice: Methods to evaluate individual patient improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this