TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
AU - Tomlinson, Tom
AU - Brody, Howard
PY - 1988/1/7
Y1 - 1988/1/7
N2 - Despite the extensive literature devoted to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, they continue to raise vexing problems for physicians, house staff, nurses, and policy makers. The difficulties include physicians' ambivalence about who should be consulted before a DNR order is written, the frustration of house officers and nurses who are asked to continue complicated or invasive treatments of a patient for whom a DNR order has been written, and hospital administrators' uncertainty and confusion over what their DNR policies should be. Many of these problems arise from the failure to distinguish among three distinct rationales for DNR orders and to appreciate their.
AB - Despite the extensive literature devoted to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, they continue to raise vexing problems for physicians, house staff, nurses, and policy makers. The difficulties include physicians' ambivalence about who should be consulted before a DNR order is written, the frustration of house officers and nurses who are asked to continue complicated or invasive treatments of a patient for whom a DNR order has been written, and hospital administrators' uncertainty and confusion over what their DNR policies should be. Many of these problems arise from the failure to distinguish among three distinct rationales for DNR orders and to appreciate their.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024280327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024280327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198801073180109
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198801073180109
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 3336383
AN - SCOPUS:0024280327
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 318
SP - 43
EP - 46
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 1
ER -