Enumeration of human lymphocyte subpopulations by immunofluorescence: a comparative study using automated flow microfluorometry and fluorescence microscopy

Alan Landay, G. Larry Gartland, Toru Abo, Max D. Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

These studies reveal that the enumeration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by fluorescence microscopy and automated flow microfluorometry show a high degree of correlation whether the cells came from normals, individuals with common variable immunodeficiency, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B cell origin or chronic lymphocytic leukemia of T cell origin. There was excellent agreement between these two methods when counting positive cells stained by the pan-T monoclonal antibodies OKT3 and Leu-1, the helper T reagents OKT4 and Leu-3a, and the suppressor T antibodies OKT8 and Leu-2a. The values obtained for B cells using a pan-B (HB-2) cell antibody analyzed by fluorescence microscopy and automated flow microfluorometry gave a correlation coefficient of 0.86. The percentage of cells identified 3y antibodies with reactivities toward peripheral blood monocytes (MMA or Leu-M1), the HLA-DR determinant, and HNK-1 (Leu-7) positive cells gave correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.90, and 0.80 respectively when compared by the 2 methods mentioned above. These data suggest that comparable values for lymphocyte subpopulations in human blood samples can be obtained using the most convenient and available technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-347
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Immunological Methods
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 25 1983
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fluorescence activated cell sorter
  • fluorescence microscopy
  • lymphocyte subpopulations
  • monoclonal antibodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enumeration of human lymphocyte subpopulations by immunofluorescence: a comparative study using automated flow microfluorometry and fluorescence microscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this