TY - JOUR
T1 - Endometrial myomectomy
T2 - a novel surgical method during cesarean section
AU - Hatırnaz, Şafak
AU - Güler, Oğuz
AU - Başaranoğlu, Serdar
AU - Tokgöz, Cengiz
AU - Kılıç, Gokhan S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/2/16
Y1 - 2018/2/16
N2 - Study objective: Comparing surgical outcomes of a novel surgical technique endometrial myomectomy (EM) to serosal myomectomy (SM) during ceserean section (CS). Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian task force classification level II 1). Setting: Private hospital. Patients: Fourty-six women with leiomyomas during cesarean section Interventions: Endometrial myomectomy and serosal myomectomy during cesarean section between 2013 and 2016. Main outcome measures: Total 22 consequtive cases (Group 1) underwent EM in the last 2 years. The control group created from SM (Group 2) cases performed before EM implemented in our practice. Group 2 was matched based on anteriorly located intramural or submucosal leiomyoma. The size, location and number of leiomyoma, hematological course during pre- and postoperative period, the need for blood transfusion, duration of surgery, and any prolongation of hospital stay also documented. Results: Median number of leiomyoma was higher in EM than in SM (p = 0.001). Median myomectomy procedure time and amount of intra-operative bleeding in SM were higher than EM (respectively, p = 0.005 and p = 0.001). In terms of other variables, there is no difference between the two myomectomy groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This novel technique EM is a safe, feasible surgical technique compared with SM. Besides the less intra-operative blood loss, it also has the potential to diminish the risk of abdominal adhesion formation.
AB - Study objective: Comparing surgical outcomes of a novel surgical technique endometrial myomectomy (EM) to serosal myomectomy (SM) during ceserean section (CS). Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian task force classification level II 1). Setting: Private hospital. Patients: Fourty-six women with leiomyomas during cesarean section Interventions: Endometrial myomectomy and serosal myomectomy during cesarean section between 2013 and 2016. Main outcome measures: Total 22 consequtive cases (Group 1) underwent EM in the last 2 years. The control group created from SM (Group 2) cases performed before EM implemented in our practice. Group 2 was matched based on anteriorly located intramural or submucosal leiomyoma. The size, location and number of leiomyoma, hematological course during pre- and postoperative period, the need for blood transfusion, duration of surgery, and any prolongation of hospital stay also documented. Results: Median number of leiomyoma was higher in EM than in SM (p = 0.001). Median myomectomy procedure time and amount of intra-operative bleeding in SM were higher than EM (respectively, p = 0.005 and p = 0.001). In terms of other variables, there is no difference between the two myomectomy groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This novel technique EM is a safe, feasible surgical technique compared with SM. Besides the less intra-operative blood loss, it also has the potential to diminish the risk of abdominal adhesion formation.
KW - Cesarean section
KW - adhesion formation
KW - endometrial myomectomy
KW - leiomyoma
KW - serosal myomectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012049349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012049349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1286320
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1286320
M3 - Article
C2 - 28114870
AN - SCOPUS:85012049349
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 31
SP - 433
EP - 438
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 4
ER -