Comparison of Routes of Administration, Frequency, and Duration of Favipiravir Treatment in Mouse and Guinea Pig Models of Ebola Virus Disease

Dylan M. Johnson, Terry Juelich, Lihong Zhang, Jennifer K. Smith, Birte K. Kalveram, David Perez, Jeanon Smith, Michael R. Grimes, Tania Garron, Maricela Torres, Shane Massey, Trevor Brasel, David W.C. Beasley, Alex N. Freiberg, Jason E. Comer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Favipiravir is a ribonucleoside analogue that has been explored as a therapeutic for the treatment of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). Promising data from rodent models has informed nonhuman primate trials, as well as evaluation in patients during the 2013–2016 West African EVD outbreak of favipiravir treatment. However, mixed results from these studies hindered regulatory approval of favipiravir for the indication of EVD. This study examined the influence of route of administration, duration of treatment, and treatment schedule of favipiravir in immune competent mouse and guinea pig models using rodent-adapted Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV). A dose of 300 mg/kg/day of favipiravir with an 8-day treatment was found to be fully effective at preventing lethal EVD-like disease in BALB/c mice regardless of route of administration (oral, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous) or whether it was provided as a once-daily dose or a twice-daily split dose. Preclinical data generated in guinea pigs demonstrates that an 8-day treatment of 300 mg/kg/day of favipiravir reduces mortality following EBOV challenge regardless of route of treatment or duration of treatments for 8, 11, or 15 days. This work supports the future translational development of favipiravir as an EVD therapeutic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1101
JournalViruses
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • EBOV
  • Ebola virus
  • T-705
  • animal model
  • favipiravir
  • filovirus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Virology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Routes of Administration, Frequency, and Duration of Favipiravir Treatment in Mouse and Guinea Pig Models of Ebola Virus Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this