TY - JOUR
T1 - Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007
AU - Homaira, Nusrat
AU - Rahman, Mahmudur
AU - Hossain, M. Jahangir
AU - Nahar, Nazmun
AU - Khan, Rasheda
AU - Rahman, Mostafizur
AU - Podder, Goutam
AU - Nahar, Kamrun
AU - Khan, Dawlat
AU - Gurley, Emily S.
AU - Rollin, Pierre E.
AU - Comer, James A.
AU - Ksiazek, Thomas G.
AU - Luby, Stephen P.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71% cases versus 0% controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.
AB - Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71% cases versus 0% controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149430469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149430469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013570
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013570
M3 - Article
C2 - 21042407
AN - SCOPUS:78149430469
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 5
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 10
M1 - e13570
ER -