TY - JOUR
T1 - Child and adolescent psychopharmacology in the new millennium
T2 - A workshop for academia, industry, and government
AU - Deveaugh-Geiss, Joseph
AU - March, John
AU - Shapiro, Mark
AU - Andreason, Paul J.
AU - Emslie, Graham
AU - Ford, Lisa M.
AU - Greenhill, Laurence
AU - Murphy, Dianne
AU - Prentice, Ernest
AU - Roberts, Rosemary
AU - Silva, Susan
AU - Swanson, James M.
AU - Van Zwieten-Boot, Barbara
AU - Vitiello, Benedetto
AU - Wagner, Karen Dineen
AU - Mangum, Barry
PY - 2006/3
Y1 - 2006/3
N2 - Objective: To give academic researchers, government officials, and industry scientists an opportunity to assess the state of pediatric psychopharmacology and identify challenges facing professionals in the field. Method: Increased federal spending and the introduction of pediatric exclusivity led to large increases in pediatric psychopharmacology research in the 1990s. Despite the increase in research, concerns exist about methods and incentives for making new medications available for use in pediatric psychiatric disorders. In recognition of these concerns, the Duke Clinical Research Institute held a roundtable in September 2004. Participants from the National Institutes of Health, regulatory agencies, academia, and the pharmaceutical industry spoke about the effects of government regulations such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act and the Pediatric Research Equity Act on pediatric research from academic, clinical, and industry perspectives, and bioethical considerations of such research. Conclusions: To ensure development of new drugs for treating psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, we must address the challenges posed by the regulatory environment governing pediatric psychopharmacology research. Strategies were identified for improving the evidence base for psychopharmacologic interventions in youth before widespread use and for more effectively defining a research agenda for the future.
AB - Objective: To give academic researchers, government officials, and industry scientists an opportunity to assess the state of pediatric psychopharmacology and identify challenges facing professionals in the field. Method: Increased federal spending and the introduction of pediatric exclusivity led to large increases in pediatric psychopharmacology research in the 1990s. Despite the increase in research, concerns exist about methods and incentives for making new medications available for use in pediatric psychiatric disorders. In recognition of these concerns, the Duke Clinical Research Institute held a roundtable in September 2004. Participants from the National Institutes of Health, regulatory agencies, academia, and the pharmaceutical industry spoke about the effects of government regulations such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act and the Pediatric Research Equity Act on pediatric research from academic, clinical, and industry perspectives, and bioethical considerations of such research. Conclusions: To ensure development of new drugs for treating psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, we must address the challenges posed by the regulatory environment governing pediatric psychopharmacology research. Strategies were identified for improving the evidence base for psychopharmacologic interventions in youth before widespread use and for more effectively defining a research agenda for the future.
KW - Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
KW - Pediatric Research Equity Act
KW - Pediatric depression
KW - Pediatric psychopharmacology
KW - Psychopharmacology trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645100012&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645100012&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.chi.0000194568.70912.ee
DO - 10.1097/01.chi.0000194568.70912.ee
M3 - Article
C2 - 16540810
AN - SCOPUS:33645100012
SN - 0890-8567
VL - 45
SP - 261
EP - 270
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -