TY - JOUR
T1 - Atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast has similar prognostic factors and survival to typical medullary breast carcinoma
T2 - 3,976 cases from the National Cancer Data Base
AU - Mateo, Alina M.
AU - Pezzi, Todd A.
AU - Sundermeyer, Mark
AU - Kelley, Cynthia A.
AU - Klimberg, Vicki S.
AU - Pezzi, Christopher M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Backgrounds and Objectives: Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a subtype with a more favorable prognosis. Tumors with some, but not all, characteristics of MBC are classified as atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast (AMCB). Methods: Patients with invasive MBC and AMCB reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004 to 2013 were compared for tumor characteristics and overall survival, using infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) as a reference. Results: Patients with MBC (n = 3,688), AMCB (n = 288), and IDC (n = 918,870) met inclusion criteria. Comparing MBC with AMCB, the mean age at diagnosis (52.9 vs. 53.9 years), mean tumor size (2.4 vs. 2.5 cm), lymph node positivity (22.8% vs. 22.4%), estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (22% vs. 25%), progesterone receptor (PR) positivity (14% vs. 15%), HER2 positivity (11% vs. 14%), rate of breast conserving surgery (67% vs. 68%), use of chemotherapy (76% vs. 75%), and use of hormonal therapy (19% vs. 18%), respectively, were not clinically or statistically different. Five-year (92% vs. 89%) and 10-year survival rates (85% vs. 87%) were not significantly different (P = 0.46). Conclusions: There does not appear to be any reason to differentiate between AMCB and MBC given the similarities in presentation, treatment and prognosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:533–536.
AB - Backgrounds and Objectives: Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a subtype with a more favorable prognosis. Tumors with some, but not all, characteristics of MBC are classified as atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast (AMCB). Methods: Patients with invasive MBC and AMCB reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004 to 2013 were compared for tumor characteristics and overall survival, using infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) as a reference. Results: Patients with MBC (n = 3,688), AMCB (n = 288), and IDC (n = 918,870) met inclusion criteria. Comparing MBC with AMCB, the mean age at diagnosis (52.9 vs. 53.9 years), mean tumor size (2.4 vs. 2.5 cm), lymph node positivity (22.8% vs. 22.4%), estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (22% vs. 25%), progesterone receptor (PR) positivity (14% vs. 15%), HER2 positivity (11% vs. 14%), rate of breast conserving surgery (67% vs. 68%), use of chemotherapy (76% vs. 75%), and use of hormonal therapy (19% vs. 18%), respectively, were not clinically or statistically different. Five-year (92% vs. 89%) and 10-year survival rates (85% vs. 87%) were not significantly different (P = 0.46). Conclusions: There does not appear to be any reason to differentiate between AMCB and MBC given the similarities in presentation, treatment and prognosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:533–536.
KW - National Cancer Data Base
KW - atypical medullary breast cancer
KW - medullary breast cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978209589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978209589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.24367
DO - 10.1002/jso.24367
M3 - Article
C2 - 27393599
AN - SCOPUS:84978209589
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 114
SP - 533
EP - 536
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 5
ER -