Association of Laboratory Science Education and Certification with Laboratory Errors The Value of Education and Certification Study

OBJECTIVES: With the exception of states that require licensure, there is no uniform requirement for certification or for education from the National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Science (NAACLS) accredited laboratory science program for employment in a laboratory, under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988. The objective of the Value of Education and Certification (VEC) study was to determine if lack of NAACLS-accredited education and Medical Laboratory Technician (MLT)/Medical Laboratory Scientist (MLS) certification was associated with laboratory errors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used personnel and testing/ reporting error data from 739 laboratorians, involving five laboratory partners. RESULTS: MLS-certified individuals were 33% less likely to make errors (p=0.0473) and MLT-certified individuals were 71% less likely to make errors (p=0.0014) compared to those who were not certified. MLS-certified laboratorians were twice as likely to make testing/reporting errors compared to those who were MLT certified, which was significant (p=0.0238). Education level and accredited laboratory education were not associated with testing/reporting errors. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that lack of MLS and MLT certification are independently associated with laboratory testing/reporting errors. J Allied Health 2024; 53(2):130–135.