TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution
T2 - Comparing Experiment and Theory
AU - Chen, Chuanying
AU - Yu, Binhan
AU - Yousefi, Razie
AU - Iwahara, Junji
AU - Pettitt, B. Montgomery
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/23
Y1 - 2022/6/23
N2 - In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.
AB - In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133100797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133100797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611
M3 - Article
C2 - 35696448
AN - SCOPUS:85133100797
SN - 1520-6106
VL - 126
SP - 4543
EP - 4554
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
IS - 24
ER -