TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Executive Nurse Leaders' Financial Literacy Level
T2 - A Mixed-Methods Study
AU - Brydges, Garry
AU - Krepper, Rebecca
AU - Nibert, Ainslie
AU - Young, Anne
AU - Luquire, Rosemary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Financial Management Competency Self-assessment (FMCA) in executive nurse leaders (ENLs) and to determine how ENLs develop and apply financial knowledge. BACKGROUND Financial literacy (FL) helps in planning, implementing, and evaluating fiscal decisions, but many ENLs report weaknesses in this core competency. METHODS An explanatory-sequential mixed-methods study was conducted to psychometrically test the FMCA and explore how ENLs with different levels of FL develop and apply financial knowledge. Eligible participants (n = 178) were recruited from a population of ENLs across the United States. RESULTS The test-retest reliability of the FMCA was good (mean difference, 6.80; 95% confidence interval). Correlations between domain scores (P <.01) and the overall score (Cronbach's =.99) demonstrated the reliability and validity of the instrument. The cutoff scores were fair indicators of different levels of FL in ENLs (P <.001). Self-awareness, gaps in hospital and graduate nursing education, application of financial knowledge, and a micro versus macro view emerged as important themes in the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION FMCA reliability and validity were established. FMCA cutoff scores were established to determine FL level, and the ENL lived experience described in financial knowledge development and application.
AB - OBJECTIVES To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Financial Management Competency Self-assessment (FMCA) in executive nurse leaders (ENLs) and to determine how ENLs develop and apply financial knowledge. BACKGROUND Financial literacy (FL) helps in planning, implementing, and evaluating fiscal decisions, but many ENLs report weaknesses in this core competency. METHODS An explanatory-sequential mixed-methods study was conducted to psychometrically test the FMCA and explore how ENLs with different levels of FL develop and apply financial knowledge. Eligible participants (n = 178) were recruited from a population of ENLs across the United States. RESULTS The test-retest reliability of the FMCA was good (mean difference, 6.80; 95% confidence interval). Correlations between domain scores (P <.01) and the overall score (Cronbach's =.99) demonstrated the reliability and validity of the instrument. The cutoff scores were fair indicators of different levels of FL in ENLs (P <.001). Self-awareness, gaps in hospital and graduate nursing education, application of financial knowledge, and a micro versus macro view emerged as important themes in the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION FMCA reliability and validity were established. FMCA cutoff scores were established to determine FL level, and the ENL lived experience described in financial knowledge development and application.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075102940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075102940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000822
DO - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000822
M3 - Article
C2 - 31725057
AN - SCOPUS:85075102940
SN - 0002-0443
VL - 49
SP - 596
EP - 603
JO - Journal of Nursing Administration
JF - Journal of Nursing Administration
IS - 12
ER -