TY - JOUR
T1 - Are topical antimicrobials effective against bacteria that are highly resistant to systemic antibiotics?
AU - Neely, Alice N.
AU - Gardner, Jason
AU - Durkee, Paula
AU - Warden, Glenn D.
AU - Greenhalgh, David G.
AU - Gallagher, James J.
AU - Herndon, David N.
AU - Tompkins, Ronald G.
AU - Kagan, Richard J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. We thank Matthias Felleisen for helpful conversations as we began our explorations of test development. This work was supported by (UK) EPSRC grant GR/F033060 “Linguistic Support for Test Development”.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - An increasing number of bacteria are resistant to multiple systemic antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to determine if topical antimicrobials are still effective against multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). MDROs, including Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus, were collected from four burn hospitals. The sensitivity of 47 MDROs to 11 commonly used topical agents (mafenide acetate, nystatin, mafenide + nystatin, silver nitrate, Dakin's, polymyxin B, neomycin, polymyxin + neomycin, silver sulfadiazine, bacitracin, silver sulfadiazine + bacitracin) was tested using the agar well diffusion assay and compared with the sensitivity of 27 non-MDROs of similar genera. Overall 88% of the tests of the non-MDROs showed susceptibility to the topicals compared with 80% for the MDROs (P <.05). Specific findings included: all of the gram-positive non-MDROs were sensitive to bacitracin compared with only 67% of the MDROs (P <.05); 74% of the non-MDROs were sensitive to neomycin vs 26% of the MDROs (P <.01). Even for the susceptible isolates, the zones of inhibition were smaller for the MDROs than for the non-MDROs (P <.002), indicating decreased susceptibility of the MDROs. Specifically, while the MDRO Acinetobacter were sensitive to most of the topicals, the zones of inhibition for silvadene, silvadene + bacitracin, neomycin, and neomycin + polymyxin were significantiy smaller (P <.001) for the Acinetobacter MDROs than the non-MDROs. Although many topicals are still effective against some MDROs, MDROs are more resistant to topicals than are non-MDROs. Some treatment assumptions based historically on the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents against non-MDROs need to be re-evaluated for MDROs.
AB - An increasing number of bacteria are resistant to multiple systemic antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to determine if topical antimicrobials are still effective against multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). MDROs, including Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus, were collected from four burn hospitals. The sensitivity of 47 MDROs to 11 commonly used topical agents (mafenide acetate, nystatin, mafenide + nystatin, silver nitrate, Dakin's, polymyxin B, neomycin, polymyxin + neomycin, silver sulfadiazine, bacitracin, silver sulfadiazine + bacitracin) was tested using the agar well diffusion assay and compared with the sensitivity of 27 non-MDROs of similar genera. Overall 88% of the tests of the non-MDROs showed susceptibility to the topicals compared with 80% for the MDROs (P <.05). Specific findings included: all of the gram-positive non-MDROs were sensitive to bacitracin compared with only 67% of the MDROs (P <.05); 74% of the non-MDROs were sensitive to neomycin vs 26% of the MDROs (P <.01). Even for the susceptible isolates, the zones of inhibition were smaller for the MDROs than for the non-MDROs (P <.002), indicating decreased susceptibility of the MDROs. Specifically, while the MDRO Acinetobacter were sensitive to most of the topicals, the zones of inhibition for silvadene, silvadene + bacitracin, neomycin, and neomycin + polymyxin were significantiy smaller (P <.001) for the Acinetobacter MDROs than the non-MDROs. Although many topicals are still effective against some MDROs, MDROs are more resistant to topicals than are non-MDROs. Some treatment assumptions based historically on the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents against non-MDROs need to be re-evaluated for MDROs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59449086737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59449086737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181921eed
DO - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181921eed
M3 - Article
C2 - 19060725
AN - SCOPUS:59449086737
SN - 1559-047X
VL - 30
SP - 19
EP - 29
JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research
JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research
IS - 1
ER -