ARE HOSPITAL SERVICES RATIONED IN NEW HAVEN OR OVER-UTILISED IN BOSTON?

John E. Wennberg, Jean L. Freeman, William J. Culp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

392 Scopus citations

Abstract

The populations of New Haven and Boston are demographically similar and receive most of their hospital care in university hospitals, but in 1982 their expenditures per head for inpatient care were $451 and $889, respectively. The 685 400 residents of Boston incurred about $300 million more in hospital expenditures and used 739 more beds than they would have if the use rates for New Haven residents had applied. Most of the extra beds were invested in higher admission rates for medical conditions in which the decision to admit can be discretionary. The overall rates for major surgery were equal, but rates for some individual operations varied widely. These findings indicate that academic standards of care are compatible with widely varying patterns of practice and that medical care costs are not necessarily high in communities served largely by university hospitals. They also emphasise the need for increased attention to the outcome and cost implications of differences in practice styles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1185-1189
Number of pages5
JournalThe Lancet
Volume329
Issue number8543
DOIs
StatePublished - May 23 1987
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ARE HOSPITAL SERVICES RATIONED IN NEW HAVEN OR OVER-UTILISED IN BOSTON?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this