TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of injury patterns and roles of care in US and Israelmilitaries during recent conflicts
T2 - Two are better than one
AU - Antebi, Ben
AU - Benov, Avi
AU - Mann-Salinas, Elizabeth A.
AU - Le, Tuan D.
AU - Cancio, Leopoldo C.
AU - Wenke, Joseph C.
AU - Paran, Haim
AU - Yitzhak, Avraham
AU - Tarif, Bader
AU - Gross, Kirby R.
AU - Dagan, David
AU - Glassberg, Elon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.).
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - BACKGROUND: As new conflicts emerge and enemies evolve, military medical organizations worldwide must adopt the "lessons learned." In this study, we describe roles of care (ROCs) deployed and injuries sustained by both US and Israeli militaries during recent conflicts. The purpose of this collaborative work is facilitate exchange of medical data among allied forces in order to advance military medicine and facilitate strategic readiness for future military engagements that may involve less predictable situations of evacuation and care, such as prolonged field care. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted for the periods of 2003 to 2014 from data retrieved from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and the Israel Defense Force (IDF) Trauma Registry. Comparative analyses included ROC capabilities, casualties who died of wounds, as well as mechanism of injury, anatomical wound distribution, and Injury Severity Score of US and IDF casualties during recent conflicts. RESULTS: Although concept of ROCswas similar amongmilitaries, the IDF supports increased capabilities at point of injury and Role 1 including the presence of physicians, but with limited deployment of other ROCs; conversely, the US maintains fewer capabilities at Role 1 but utilized the entire spectrum of care, including extensive deployment of Roles 2/2+, during recent conflicts. Casualties from US forces (n = 19,005) and IDF (n = 2,637) exhibited significant differences in patterns of injury with higher proportions of casualties who died of wounds in the US forces (4%) compared with the IDF (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: As these data suggest deployed ROCs and injury patterns of US and Israeli militaries were both conflict and system specific. We envision that identification of discordant factors and common medical strategies of the two militaries will enable strategic readiness for future conflicts as well as foster further collaboration among allied forces with the overarching universal goal of eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81: S87-S94.
AB - BACKGROUND: As new conflicts emerge and enemies evolve, military medical organizations worldwide must adopt the "lessons learned." In this study, we describe roles of care (ROCs) deployed and injuries sustained by both US and Israeli militaries during recent conflicts. The purpose of this collaborative work is facilitate exchange of medical data among allied forces in order to advance military medicine and facilitate strategic readiness for future military engagements that may involve less predictable situations of evacuation and care, such as prolonged field care. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted for the periods of 2003 to 2014 from data retrieved from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and the Israel Defense Force (IDF) Trauma Registry. Comparative analyses included ROC capabilities, casualties who died of wounds, as well as mechanism of injury, anatomical wound distribution, and Injury Severity Score of US and IDF casualties during recent conflicts. RESULTS: Although concept of ROCswas similar amongmilitaries, the IDF supports increased capabilities at point of injury and Role 1 including the presence of physicians, but with limited deployment of other ROCs; conversely, the US maintains fewer capabilities at Role 1 but utilized the entire spectrum of care, including extensive deployment of Roles 2/2+, during recent conflicts. Casualties from US forces (n = 19,005) and IDF (n = 2,637) exhibited significant differences in patterns of injury with higher proportions of casualties who died of wounds in the US forces (4%) compared with the IDF (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: As these data suggest deployed ROCs and injury patterns of US and Israeli militaries were both conflict and system specific. We envision that identification of discordant factors and common medical strategies of the two militaries will enable strategic readiness for future conflicts as well as foster further collaboration among allied forces with the overarching universal goal of eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81: S87-S94.
KW - Combat casualty care
KW - Israel Defense Forces
KW - Prolonged field care
KW - Roles of care
KW - Trauma
KW - US
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986199019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986199019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001252
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001252
M3 - Article
C2 - 27602905
AN - SCOPUS:84986199019
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 81
SP - S87-S94
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 5
ER -