TY - JOUR
T1 - American burn association/shriners hospitals for children burn outcomes questionnaire
T2 - Construction and psychometric properties
AU - Daltroy, Lawren H.
AU - Liang, Matthew H.
AU - Phillips, Charlotte B.
AU - Daugherty, Mary Beth
AU - Hinson, Michelle
AU - Jenkins, Marilyn
AU - McCauley, Robert
AU - Meyer, Walter
AU - Munster, Andrew
AU - Pidcock, Frank
AU - Reilly, Debra
AU - Tunell, William
AU - Warden, Glenn
AU - Wood, David
AU - Tompkins, Ronald
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - To develop a standardized, practical, self-administered questionnaire to monitor pediatric patients with burns and to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive pediatric burn management treatments, a group of experts generated a set of items to measure relevant burn outcomes. Children between die ages of 5 and 18 years were assessed in a cross-sectional study. Both parent and adolescent responses were obtained from children 11 to 18 years old. The internal reliability of final scales ranged from 0.82 to 0.93 among parents and from 0.75 to 0.92 among adolescents. Mean differences between parent and adolescent were small; the greatest difference occurred in the appearance subscale. Parental scales showed evidence of validity and potential for sensitivity to change. In an effort to support the construct validity of die new scales, they were compared with die Child Healtii Questionnaire and related to each otiier in clinically sensible ways. These burn outcomes scales reliably and validly assess function in patients with burns, and the scales have been developed in such a way that tfiey are likely to be sensitive to change over time. (J Burn Care Rehabil 2000;21:29-39).
AB - To develop a standardized, practical, self-administered questionnaire to monitor pediatric patients with burns and to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive pediatric burn management treatments, a group of experts generated a set of items to measure relevant burn outcomes. Children between die ages of 5 and 18 years were assessed in a cross-sectional study. Both parent and adolescent responses were obtained from children 11 to 18 years old. The internal reliability of final scales ranged from 0.82 to 0.93 among parents and from 0.75 to 0.92 among adolescents. Mean differences between parent and adolescent were small; the greatest difference occurred in the appearance subscale. Parental scales showed evidence of validity and potential for sensitivity to change. In an effort to support the construct validity of die new scales, they were compared with die Child Healtii Questionnaire and related to each otiier in clinically sensible ways. These burn outcomes scales reliably and validly assess function in patients with burns, and the scales have been developed in such a way that tfiey are likely to be sensitive to change over time. (J Burn Care Rehabil 2000;21:29-39).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144455144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144455144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004630-200021010-00007
DO - 10.1097/00004630-200021010-00007
M3 - Article
C2 - 10661536
AN - SCOPUS:17144455144
SN - 0273-8481
VL - 21
SP - 29
EP - 39
JO - Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation
IS - 1
ER -