TY - JOUR
T1 - Adverse events involving hallux metatarsophalangeal joint implants
T2 - Analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration data from 2010 to 2018
AU - Akoh, Craig C.
AU - Chen, Jie
AU - Kadakia, Rishin
AU - Park, Young Uk
AU - Kim, Hyongnyun
AU - Adams, Samuel B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 European Foot and Ankle Society
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is 1 in 40 people over the age of 50. Surgical treatment options for MTPJ arthritis include joint preservation, joint resurfacing, and arthrodesis. Hallux MTPJ implants have evolved over the past several decades, but are associated with various complications. The aim of this study was to examine the MAUDE database to determine reported adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Materials and methods: The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was reviewed from 2010 to 2018 to review voluntary reported adverse event reports for approved implants within the United States. We recorded the type of adverse event and excluded duplicate reports and those extracted from already published literature. Results: Among 64 reported hallux MTPJ implant adverse events, the most common modes of adverse events were component loosening (34%), infection (14.1%), component fracture (9.4%), inflammation (9.4%), and allergic reaction (7.8%). Regarding implant type, Cartiva SCI had the highest percentage of adverse events (23.4%), followed by Arthrosurface ToeMotion (20.3%), Ascension MGT (12.5%), Arthrosurface HemiCAP® (10.9%), Futura primus (9.4%), and Osteomed Reflexion (6.3%). There was an increase in reported adverse events after 2016. The MAUDE database does not report the total incidence of implant insertion. Conclusion: Our study of the MAUDE database demonstrated that component loosening and infection are the most common modes of adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Cartiva accounted for one-fourth of the implant-related adverse events during our study period, followed by ToeMotion, and Ascension MGT implants. Continued reporting of adverse events will improve our understanding on short and long-term complications of various hallux MTPJ implants. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series from Large Database Analysis; Treatment Study.
AB - Background: The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is 1 in 40 people over the age of 50. Surgical treatment options for MTPJ arthritis include joint preservation, joint resurfacing, and arthrodesis. Hallux MTPJ implants have evolved over the past several decades, but are associated with various complications. The aim of this study was to examine the MAUDE database to determine reported adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Materials and methods: The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was reviewed from 2010 to 2018 to review voluntary reported adverse event reports for approved implants within the United States. We recorded the type of adverse event and excluded duplicate reports and those extracted from already published literature. Results: Among 64 reported hallux MTPJ implant adverse events, the most common modes of adverse events were component loosening (34%), infection (14.1%), component fracture (9.4%), inflammation (9.4%), and allergic reaction (7.8%). Regarding implant type, Cartiva SCI had the highest percentage of adverse events (23.4%), followed by Arthrosurface ToeMotion (20.3%), Ascension MGT (12.5%), Arthrosurface HemiCAP® (10.9%), Futura primus (9.4%), and Osteomed Reflexion (6.3%). There was an increase in reported adverse events after 2016. The MAUDE database does not report the total incidence of implant insertion. Conclusion: Our study of the MAUDE database demonstrated that component loosening and infection are the most common modes of adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Cartiva accounted for one-fourth of the implant-related adverse events during our study period, followed by ToeMotion, and Ascension MGT implants. Continued reporting of adverse events will improve our understanding on short and long-term complications of various hallux MTPJ implants. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series from Large Database Analysis; Treatment Study.
KW - Cartiva
KW - Failure
KW - Loosening
KW - MAUDE database
KW - Metatarsophalangeal joint implants
KW - Recall
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085762866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085762866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fas.2020.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.fas.2020.05.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 32505511
AN - SCOPUS:85085762866
SN - 1268-7731
VL - 27
SP - 381
EP - 388
JO - Foot and Ankle Surgery
JF - Foot and Ankle Surgery
IS - 4
ER -