TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjuvant Management of Pathologic Node–Positive Disease After Definitive Surgery for Clinical T1-2 N0 Rectal Cancer
AU - Polamraju, Praveen
AU - Haque, Waqar
AU - Verma, Vivek
AU - Wiederhold, Lee
AU - Hatch, Sandra
AU - Butler, E. Brian
AU - Teh, Bin S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Introduction: Patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are often treated with up-front surgical resection, with adjuvant treatment reserved for patients upstaged with pathologic node-positive (pN+) disease at surgery. This study evaluates practice patterns and clinical outcomes when comparing different forms of adjuvant treatment for this patient population. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2015 with postoperative pN+ disease treated without neoadjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into groups receiving observation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of adjuvant treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS. Results: Altogether, 1466 patients met the inclusion criteria; 536 patients (36.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 413 (28.2%) received adjuvant CRT, and 517 (35.3%) were observed postoperatively. Use of adjuvant treatment was associated with superior median OS (124.1 vs. 51.1 months, P <.001), persisting after propensity score matching (124.0 vs. 61.9 months, P <.001), but not between adjuvant CRT versus chemotherapy on subset analysis. Patients with positive surgical margins receiving adjuvant CRT showed a trend toward OS improvement compared to patients managed with chemotherapy (54.9 vs. 47.4 months, P =.10). Increased age, pN2 status, positive margin status, and observation were associated with poorer OS. Conclusion: Most patients found to have pN+ disease after up-front surgery for cT1-2N0 rectal cancer receive adjuvant treatment, which is associated with improved OS. Chemotherapy or CRT are appropriate options, although there was a trend toward higher OS for patients with positive surgical margins receiving CRT. Most patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are treated surgically, followed by adjuvant treatment if pathologically positive lymph nodes are subsequently discovered. With the National Cancer Data Base, clinical outcomes for 1466 patients were compared on the basis of the type of adjuvant management received. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is associated with improved overall survival compared to observation and may be offered to patients.
AB - Introduction: Patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are often treated with up-front surgical resection, with adjuvant treatment reserved for patients upstaged with pathologic node-positive (pN+) disease at surgery. This study evaluates practice patterns and clinical outcomes when comparing different forms of adjuvant treatment for this patient population. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2015 with postoperative pN+ disease treated without neoadjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into groups receiving observation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of adjuvant treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves compared overall survival (OS), and Cox regression determined patient factors associated with OS. Results: Altogether, 1466 patients met the inclusion criteria; 536 patients (36.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 413 (28.2%) received adjuvant CRT, and 517 (35.3%) were observed postoperatively. Use of adjuvant treatment was associated with superior median OS (124.1 vs. 51.1 months, P <.001), persisting after propensity score matching (124.0 vs. 61.9 months, P <.001), but not between adjuvant CRT versus chemotherapy on subset analysis. Patients with positive surgical margins receiving adjuvant CRT showed a trend toward OS improvement compared to patients managed with chemotherapy (54.9 vs. 47.4 months, P =.10). Increased age, pN2 status, positive margin status, and observation were associated with poorer OS. Conclusion: Most patients found to have pN+ disease after up-front surgery for cT1-2N0 rectal cancer receive adjuvant treatment, which is associated with improved OS. Chemotherapy or CRT are appropriate options, although there was a trend toward higher OS for patients with positive surgical margins receiving CRT. Most patients with cT1-2N0M0 rectal cancer are treated surgically, followed by adjuvant treatment if pathologically positive lymph nodes are subsequently discovered. With the National Cancer Data Base, clinical outcomes for 1466 patients were compared on the basis of the type of adjuvant management received. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is associated with improved overall survival compared to observation and may be offered to patients.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Margins
KW - Observation
KW - Occult nodes
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046695420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046695420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 29753642
AN - SCOPUS:85046695420
SN - 1533-0028
VL - 17
SP - e519-e530
JO - Clinical Colorectal Cancer
JF - Clinical Colorectal Cancer
IS - 3
ER -