TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute procedural interventions after pediatric blunt abdominal trauma
T2 - A prospective multicenter evaluation
AU - Arbra, Chase A.
AU - Vogel, Adam M.
AU - Zhang, Jingwen
AU - Mauldin, Patrick D.
AU - Huang, Eunice Y.
AU - Savoie, Kate B.
AU - Santore, Matthew T.
AU - Tsao, Kuojen
AU - Ostovar-Kermani, Tiffany G.
AU - Falcone, Richard A.
AU - Dassinger, M. Sidney
AU - Recicar, John
AU - Haynes, Jeffrey H.
AU - Blakely, Martin L.
AU - Russell, Robert T.
AU - Naik-Mathuria, Bindi J.
AU - St Peter, Shawn D.
AU - Mooney, David P.
AU - Onwubiko, Chinwendu
AU - Upperman, Jeffrey S.
AU - Streck, Christian J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Pediatric intra-abdominal injuries (IAI) from blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) rarely require emergent intervention. For those children undergoing procedural intervention, our aim was to understand the timing and indications for operation and angiographic embolization. METHODS We prospectively enrolled children younger than 16 years after BAT at 14 Level I Pediatric Trauma Centers over a 1-year period. Patients with IAI who received an intervention (IAI-I) were compared with those who did not receive an intervention using descriptive statistics and univariate analysis; p less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-one (11.9%) of 2,188 patients had IAI. Forty-five (17.2%) IAI patients received an acute procedural intervention (38 operations, seven angiographic embolization). The mean age for patients requiring intervention was 7.1 ± 4.1 years and not different from the population. Most patients (88.9%) with IAI-I were normotensive. IAI-I patients were significantly more likely to have a mechanism of motor vehicle collision (66.7% vs. 38.9%), more likely to present as a Level I activation (44.4% vs. 26.9%), more likely to have a Glascow Coma Scale less than 14 (31.1% vs. 15.5%), and more likely to have an abnormal abdominal physical examination (93.3% vs. 65.7%) than patients that did not require acute intervention. All patients underwent computed tomography scan before intervention. Operations consisted of laparotomy (n = 21), laparoscopy converted to open (n = 11), and laparoscopy alone (n = 6). The most common surgical indications were hollow viscus injury (HVI) (11 small bowel, 10 colon, 6 small bowel/colon, 2 duodenum). All interventions for solid organ injury, including seven angioembolic procedures, occurred within 8 hours of arrival; many had hypotension and received a transfusion. Procedural interventions were more common for HVI than for solid organ injury (59.2% vs. 7.6%). Postoperative mortality from IAI was 2.6%. CONCLUSION Acute procedural interventions for children with IAI from BAT are rare, predominantly for HVI, are performed early in the hospital course and have excellent clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.
AB - BACKGROUND Pediatric intra-abdominal injuries (IAI) from blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) rarely require emergent intervention. For those children undergoing procedural intervention, our aim was to understand the timing and indications for operation and angiographic embolization. METHODS We prospectively enrolled children younger than 16 years after BAT at 14 Level I Pediatric Trauma Centers over a 1-year period. Patients with IAI who received an intervention (IAI-I) were compared with those who did not receive an intervention using descriptive statistics and univariate analysis; p less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-one (11.9%) of 2,188 patients had IAI. Forty-five (17.2%) IAI patients received an acute procedural intervention (38 operations, seven angiographic embolization). The mean age for patients requiring intervention was 7.1 ± 4.1 years and not different from the population. Most patients (88.9%) with IAI-I were normotensive. IAI-I patients were significantly more likely to have a mechanism of motor vehicle collision (66.7% vs. 38.9%), more likely to present as a Level I activation (44.4% vs. 26.9%), more likely to have a Glascow Coma Scale less than 14 (31.1% vs. 15.5%), and more likely to have an abnormal abdominal physical examination (93.3% vs. 65.7%) than patients that did not require acute intervention. All patients underwent computed tomography scan before intervention. Operations consisted of laparotomy (n = 21), laparoscopy converted to open (n = 11), and laparoscopy alone (n = 6). The most common surgical indications were hollow viscus injury (HVI) (11 small bowel, 10 colon, 6 small bowel/colon, 2 duodenum). All interventions for solid organ injury, including seven angioembolic procedures, occurred within 8 hours of arrival; many had hypotension and received a transfusion. Procedural interventions were more common for HVI than for solid organ injury (59.2% vs. 7.6%). Postoperative mortality from IAI was 2.6%. CONCLUSION Acute procedural interventions for children with IAI from BAT are rare, predominantly for HVI, are performed early in the hospital course and have excellent clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.
KW - Pediatric
KW - angiographic embolization
KW - blunt abdominal trauma
KW - intra-abdominal injury
KW - surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030615748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030615748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001533
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001533
M3 - Article
C2 - 28930954
AN - SCOPUS:85030615748
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 83
SP - 597
EP - 602
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 4
ER -