TY - JOUR
T1 - Absence of neurogenesis of adult rat dorsal root ganglion cells
AU - La Forte, Russell A.
AU - Melville, Sharon
AU - Chung, Kyungsoon
AU - Coggeshall, Richard E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been supported in Part by Grants NS11255,N S10161, and NS07185 from the National Institutes of Health, and by the Bristol-Myers Company.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - Recently, an age-related increase in the number of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells was reported in adult rats. This suggests neurogenesis of adult primary afferent neurons, which would be an extremely important phenomenon if it occurred. Other evidence is not compatible with this idea, however, so the issue is not settled. The primary point of contention concerns the counts of DRG cells in relation to age. In our opinion, these disagreements arise, at least in part, because different counting methods give different results for the same material. Thus, any method for determining DRG cell numbers should be calibrated. We previously calibrated some of the common methods used to count DRG cells and found that an empirical method gave accurate cell counts. In the present study, we have used this method and asked whether an age-related increase in the number of lumbar DRG cells can be demonstrated in adult rats. Our data indicate that DRG cell numbers remain essentially constant from 3 to 22 months of age. Most ancillary evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that mammalian DRG cell numbers do not change during adult life. Thus, we feel that the evidence does not support the hypothesis that there is neurogenesis of adult rat primary afferent neurons.
AB - Recently, an age-related increase in the number of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells was reported in adult rats. This suggests neurogenesis of adult primary afferent neurons, which would be an extremely important phenomenon if it occurred. Other evidence is not compatible with this idea, however, so the issue is not settled. The primary point of contention concerns the counts of DRG cells in relation to age. In our opinion, these disagreements arise, at least in part, because different counting methods give different results for the same material. Thus, any method for determining DRG cell numbers should be calibrated. We previously calibrated some of the common methods used to count DRG cells and found that an empirical method gave accurate cell counts. In the present study, we have used this method and asked whether an age-related increase in the number of lumbar DRG cells can be demonstrated in adult rats. Our data indicate that DRG cell numbers remain essentially constant from 3 to 22 months of age. Most ancillary evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that mammalian DRG cell numbers do not change during adult life. Thus, we feel that the evidence does not support the hypothesis that there is neurogenesis of adult rat primary afferent neurons.
KW - Dorsal root ganglion cells
KW - Neurogenesis
KW - Neuronal numbers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025731792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025731792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/08990229109144723
DO - 10.3109/08990229109144723
M3 - Article
C2 - 2048361
AN - SCOPUS:0025731792
SN - 0899-0220
VL - 8
SP - 3
EP - 7
JO - Somatosensory & Motor Research
JF - Somatosensory & Motor Research
IS - 1
ER -