TY - JOUR
T1 - A cross-sectional study of small mammals for tick-borne pathogen infection in northern Mongolia
AU - Pulscher, Laura A.
AU - Moore, Thomas C.
AU - Caddell, Luke
AU - Sukhbaatar, Lkhagvatseren
AU - von Fricken, Michael E.
AU - Anderson, Benjamin D.
AU - Gonchigoo, Battsetseg
AU - Gray, Gregory C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are frequently studied in developed nations but are often neglected in emerging countries. In Mongolia, TBP research is especially sparse, with few research reports focusing upon human and domestic animal disease and tick ecology. However, little information exists on TBPs in small mammals. Methods: In this 2016 cross-sectional pilot study, we sought to uniquely study wildlife for TBPs. We live-trapped small mammals, and tested their whole blood, serum and ear biopsy samples for molecular or serological evidence of Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. Results: Of 64 small mammals collected, 56.0%, 39.0% and 0.0% of animals were positive by molecular assays for Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Erhlicia spp., respectively. 41.9% were seropositive for A. phagocytophilum and 24.2% of animals were seropositive for Rickettsia rickettsii. Conclusion: This pilot data demonstrates evidence of a number of TBPs among small mammal populations in northern Mongolia and suggests the need to further investigate what role these mammals play in human and domestic animal disease.
AB - Background: Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are frequently studied in developed nations but are often neglected in emerging countries. In Mongolia, TBP research is especially sparse, with few research reports focusing upon human and domestic animal disease and tick ecology. However, little information exists on TBPs in small mammals. Methods: In this 2016 cross-sectional pilot study, we sought to uniquely study wildlife for TBPs. We live-trapped small mammals, and tested their whole blood, serum and ear biopsy samples for molecular or serological evidence of Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. Results: Of 64 small mammals collected, 56.0%, 39.0% and 0.0% of animals were positive by molecular assays for Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Erhlicia spp., respectively. 41.9% were seropositive for A. phagocytophilum and 24.2% of animals were seropositive for Rickettsia rickettsii. Conclusion: This pilot data demonstrates evidence of a number of TBPs among small mammal populations in northern Mongolia and suggests the need to further investigate what role these mammals play in human and domestic animal disease.
KW - Anaplasmaspp
KW - Borreliaspp
KW - Mongolia
KW - Rickettsiaspp
KW - Rodentia
KW - tick-borne pathogens
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051842480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051842480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591
DO - 10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051842480
SN - 2000-8686
VL - 8
JO - Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
JF - Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
IS - 1
M1 - 1450591
ER -